Feb. 22, 2013
11:29 p.m.
Brian, On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Cute <brianacute@gmail.com> wrote:
As a point of reference, ATRT1 established a rule of open and transparent meetings and work. The Team established the possibility of "closed session" with Chatham House Rule if necessary but to also provide a summary or closed sessions for the community/public.
That seems eminently reasonable. Were there any negative repercussions that the first ATRT experienced that would suggest we not follow this rule with ATRT2? Thanks, -drc