Agree-thanks for suggestion, Mike. Adam From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 5:41 PM To: bc-GNSO@icann.org Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Last Call: BC discussion draft for SSR comments, to be filed 6-April Thanks Adam, Mikey, Steve and others for drafting this excellent piece. I have but one issue with it. I suggest changing this sentence, which follows the numbering of the 3 issues: The BC recognizes the narrow scope of ICANN's technical coordination role, but this should not be relied upon to limit participation in coordinated efforts to combat malicious DNS activity. I do not think the BC should be recognizing any "narrow scope" of ICANN's role, at least not without defining what we mean. Instead, I propose this: ICANN's Bylaws require it "to ensure the stable and secure operation" of the DNS. Therefore, ICANN must view participation in coordinated, industry efforts to combat malicious DNS as absolutely essential to that mission. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com<http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:06 PM To: bc-GNSO@icann.org Subject: [bc-gnso] Last Call: BC discussion draft for SSR comments, to be filed 6-April As discussed on yesterday's BC member call, this is "last call" on SSR. Please review and comment on our discussion draft in response to SSR (Security, Stability and Resiliency) review team issues. SSR Review Team (AoC) Set of Issues (Due 6-Apr) Adam Palmer's draft circulated 24-Mar. Mikey O'Connor circulated edits 25-Mar Awaiting reaction from members and Adam on Mikey's markup. (attached) On 3/24/11 11:22 PM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> wrote: ICANN's Affirmation of Commitments required a community review of DNS Security Stability & Resiliency (SSR). The SSR Review Team is now gathering public input on the set of issues it proposes for this review. Attached is a discussion draft for BC submission, prepared by Adam Palmer. Several of the 11 issues in this draft are empty - some because answers are given elsewhere in the draft; rest are blank because Adam wanted to leave room for other BC members to add their security expertise! The Review Team is seeking responses by 6-April, so today (24-March) begins our 14-day review period for this discussion draft. Please review and post your suggestions/edits as soon as possible. If there are no disagreements noted by 1-April, these comments will be adopted without a voting period, and posted to ICANN on 6-April. As always, BC members are also encouraged to submit their own responses and to share those with the BC list. For topic background, see http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ssr-rt-issues Thanks again to Adam for volunteering to do this discussion draft. And thanks to Jeff Brueggeman for serving on the SSR Review Team. Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination