Thanks so much for your feedback Ron! Much appreciated. Gabi *Gabriela Szlak * * * *Skype:* gabrielaszlak *Twitter: @*GabiSzlak La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial. The information in this e-mail is confidential. 2013/10/22 Ron Andruff <randruff@rnapartners.com>
Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues, ****
** **
The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by which PICS enforcement can be strengthened. Considering that the March PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is going in the right direction in my view.****
** **
I support this good work.****
** **
Thanks and kind regards,****
** **
RA****
** **
*Ron Andruff*
*RNA Partners*
*www.rnapartners.com* <http://www.rnapartners.com>* *
** **
*From:* owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve DelBianco *Sent:* Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29 *To:* bc-gnso@icann.org *Cc:* Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak *Subject:* [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution****
** **
During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this public comment:****
** **
Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution procedure<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-picdrp-02oct13-en.htm> (PICDRP). The BC advocated for public interest commitments (beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the DRP. Need a volunteer…****
** **
We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the challenge. ****
** **
Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and comment. Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions. We will finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct.****
** **
Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead.****
** **
--Steve****
****