Thanks very much Michael However, I didn't make the decision lightly. My views were well known within the membership circle and I did what I said I was going to do. The BC is closing down not opening up and it certainly isn't opening up to new voices from different places who care about wider business issues -- my consulting interest is a minor part of my broader business life. ICANN will have to deal with that at an organisational level. Best wishes and, yes, always mutual respect even if there are differing views. Liz On 5 Feb 2010, at 15:58, Michael D. Palage wrote:
Liz,
If there is one thing I have learned in 11 years of ICANN battles, is that it is best to sometimes take 24 hours before sending certain emails. Over the better part of those 11 years we have sometimes been on the same side of an issue or the opposite side of an issue, regardless I think there has always been a mutual respect.
I understand and appreciate your concerns but resigning does not seem to be part of the solution, but appears to add to the problem a lack of geo graphic diversity within the BC. As a sort of nomad of the GNSO, actively participating in various constituencies, may I recommend maintaining your membership in the BC and look to get involved in other constituencies. By the way, the Registry Constituency just approved the process for observer members to join. Based on your work with CORE this would seem to be a natural fit with some of the new gTLD would are likely to be doing. As a consultant much like yourself, I find the different viewpoints voiced /advocated within different constituencies constructive.
As a long time member of the BC, I have seen an ebb and flow in the dynamics and its make-up. Play the long game, stay engaged and things will change they always do.
Just my two cents.
Best regards,
Michael
-----Original Message----- From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Liz Williams Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 10:14 AM To: bc - GNSO list Subject: [bc-gnso] Anzaja: resignation
Dear colleagues
There is little point in being part of an organisation so dominated by US based interests. There is nought to congratulate ourselves about being so clearly dominated by one particular group when there are such broader issues at stake. We have failed substantially to meet our charter obligations and the new executive committee will have a large task on its hands to ensure a fresh and innovative approach to representing business interests across the board.
I have asked Gary to remove me from BC membership with immediate effect.
Liz