Business Constituency response to WHOIS Review Team questions
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e6f79e812a3c567e92350ccdd04895a5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Attached is the response of the Business Constituency (BC) to questions from The WHOIS Policy Review Team. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. Sarah Deutsch served as Rapporteur for this response. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org <http://Www.bizconst.org/>
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e6f79e812a3c567e92350ccdd04895a5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted. If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e6f79e812a3c567e92350ccdd04895a5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call. As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)? This comment is due 13-Feb-2012. Thanks, Steve From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400 To: <irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org>> Cc: "'bc-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:'bc-GNSO@icann.org> GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted. If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6d21d8b8f92f89e340dc88e5b6d6f3f6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one. i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level. sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't. sorry, mikey On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link)?
This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
Thanks, Steve
From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400 To: <irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org> Cc: "'bc-GNSO@icann.org GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.
If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.
This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org
- - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/43dabc8c2458208e79a8bffa744e4002.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I saw your comments earlier, Mikey. and your leadership on DSSA is our priority, in all cases. Chris is doing an outreach event for the BC, and possibly drowning in work that I keep sending his way, on BC adm stuff, and if he denies it, BC folks, he is just being nice!!! Steve, can you do this, and maybe Phil would help? Marilyn CadeBC Chair Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations From: mike@haven2.com Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:20:10 -0600 CC: chris@andalucia.com; bc-gnso@icann.org To: sdelbianco@netchoice.org i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one. i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level. sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't. sorry, mikey On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote: Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call. As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link)? This comment is due 13-Feb-2012. Thanks, Steve From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400 To: <irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org> Cc: "'bc-GNSO@icann.org GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted. If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org - - - - - - - - -phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.comhandle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a0e887f526a0a32cf1a8489911bb55cf.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
That's for the current, ongoing IRTP-C WG, where they are still in the planning rather than very much substantive stages. The comment period is for one recommendation from last year's IRTP-B. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:20 PM To: Steve DelBianco Cc: Chris Chaplow; bc - GNSO list Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one. i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level. sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't. sorry, mikey On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote: Mikey and Chris - following up on today's BC member call. As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)? This comment is due 13-Feb-2012. Thanks, Steve From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400 To: <irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org>> Cc: "'bc-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:'bc-GNSO@icann.org> GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted. If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org<http://Www.bizconst.org/> - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.) ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4796 - Release Date: 02/08/12
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e6f79e812a3c567e92350ccdd04895a5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
That's why we directed this request to Mikey and Chris instead of Phil. No worries — I will amend our August comment and submit. --Steve From: Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 23:47:27 +0000 To: Mike O'Connor <mike@haven2.com<mailto:mike@haven2.com>>, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Cc: Chris Chaplow <chris@andalucia.com<mailto:chris@andalucia.com>>, bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations That’s for the current, ongoing IRTP-C WG, where they are still in the planning rather than very much substantive stages. The comment period is for one recommendation from last year’s IRTP-B. Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: owner-bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org> [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 6:20 PM To: Steve DelBianco Cc: Chris Chaplow; bc - GNSO list Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one. i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level. sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't. sorry, mikey On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote: Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call. As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)? This comment is due 13-Feb-2012. Thanks, Steve From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org>> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400 To: <irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations@icann.org>> Cc: "'bc-GNSO@icann.org<mailto:'bc-GNSO@icann.org> GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso@icann.org>> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted. If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate. This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice chair for policy coordination ICANN Business Constituency http://Www.bizconst.org<http://Www.bizconst.org/> - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.) ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2112/4796 - Release Date: 02/08/12
participants (4)
-
Marilyn Cade
-
Mike O'Connor
-
Phil Corwin
-
Steve DelBianco