Hi, While there was a suggestion to co-ordinate the surveys so that ALSes wouldn't be confused being asked multiple surveys and thus multiple links to visit, etc, there wasn't much enthusiasm for such coordination. Given that the ATLAS II survey has/was been updated offwiki and will likely be finalised very soon, I suggest that the focus should be to review (and approve) our capacity survey as-is without sharing at this point. Dev Anand On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Satish Babu <director@icfoss.in> wrote:
Hi Sala, Tijani If I remember right, there was a discussion on the potential overlap between the ATLAS 2 survey and our survey. There was a suggestion that since we were largely interested in the capacity aspect (present capacity as well as gaps), we needn't collect other information (which we can get from ATLAS2), but I don't think we took a final call on this. If we can decide on this aspect, we can quickly wrap it up and go ahead.
Perhaps Dev can add to this discussion since he was there in both the meetings at Durban.
BTW, the page history indicates that it has not been edited since 18 July, so this looks like the current version
satish
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com> wrote:
The Survey pretty much needs to be finalised and wrapped up. Following Durban, people have had more than enough time to make changes if any. I would suggest that we finalise the Survey promptly: Satish, Oksana- could you please check to see whether the version posted in the wiki was the one we went through in Durban, it somehow looks different.
I like Tijani's additions as well. Just so we are not working on an old draft when it has already been revised, please double and triple check. When you are all satisfied, they can then be hosted on Survey monkey and the link sent to all.
We should not collect information we already have, that was what was decided already and agreed to by all, such as contact details of ALSes we should target both ALSes and members of ALSes as respondents of our Survey. Let Staff work on ALS contact details and updating their records etc.
I have this feeling that the draft on the wiki is a very old version of the survey and the revised one is not uploaded yet....
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:02 AM, "Tijani BENJEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn> wrote:
FYI
De : Tijani BEN JEMAA [mailto:tijani.benjemaa@planet.tn] Envoyé : mercredi 28 août 2013 15:26 À : 'At-Large Capacity Building WG' Cc : 'ICANN At-Large Staff' Objet : Teleconference
Dear all,
Since 13 August, I have made some proposals for modifications on the draft survey (see the wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Capacity+Building+WG+Su...). Please have a look and give your opinion.
Also, we need to have a conference call. We have a lot of urgent and less urgent issues to address.
One of the urgent issue is the preparation of our ALSes for the At-Large Summit; we need to coordinate our efforts with the ATLAS II WG and with the regional secretariats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: + 216 41 649 605
Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
Fax: + 216 70 853 376
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ capacity-building-wg mailing list capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
_______________________________________________ capacity-building-wg mailing list capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
_______________________________________________ capacity-building-wg mailing list capacity-building-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg