Dear Niels, dear all, after reading this short email exchange with Michele, I realised that may be we have to be clearer when we send the proposed wording of the statement to the board. I suggest inclusion of the explanation "what it means". Furthermore, after the call yesterday I am still not convinced that we can be sure that the board wants to go further than the language provided in the bylaw. I can suggest as an alternative solution that we send two proposed statements: (1) the one we discussed on the call and which is based on the bylaw (2) the statement on operationalisation and assessment that we drafted after the call. In this case, depending on what was the notion behind making this statement, the board can either chose one of them or draft a combination of two. What do you think? Cheers Tanya On 10 February 2016 at 16:29, Niels ten Oever via cc-humanrights3 < cc-humanrights3@icann.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi Michele,
This statement means that the ICANN board will:
1. operationalize it's commitment to human rights 2. contribute to a Human Rights Impact Assessment with the community of stakeholders 3. contribute to the development of a Human Rights Policy with the community of stakeholders 4. work on a process for remediation.
Does this make it more clear? If not, can you make your question a bit more precise?
Best,
Niels
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
On 02/10/2016 04:24 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
The board of ICANN commits to take concrete steps to
operationalize its core value of respecting human rights within ICANN's mission. The steps will include working together with the community to understand the potential human rights impacts of its operations through a human rights impact assessment, engagement of the board, management, staff and stakeholders toward a common understanding of priority human rights issues, and putting in place a human rights policy to address the priority issues. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWu1dIAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpKEkIAIc9Iwu3xfKM/ZEHLr+a19jO Q9DruZSb77SAJD8Owser8HYB+Ak0mWAMEqNNv6g0TvwpTauD/nwxNBEFdM5aqMMi VgETpCQ17rRCH89lOR7gwpAR4HOEkUNfiWonDR977Hc4AxyMqKEE6yx4WD02a1pe rzjbVW7i7GCXCTlGpNQMGJMLky/atQnkCbRmXG7DtWR/tXiMLkMBXsa0NaalTcsy rhABORH7XxQ5+ABYhv/B3RpNAKvZQKlwEfqftULIVMWdVKtgvU5zDUlkIddoYBI6 LnTXNGwuFD8peQHWNRm7FBsmuQF1bgJp8nZiGfRieSVSJ8R+kkMpaXRAIyat/Ps= =tx9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cc-humanrights3 mailing list cc-humanrights3@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights3