Hi Niels and All, The Rights Protection Mechanism listing seem a little more directive than the other phrases -- and could be read to urge specific positions rather than just listing the ICANN proceedings that are looking at the issues. Can we be a bit more neutral in our phrasing? I would recommend: - Review of appropriate protections for IGOs/INGOs in gTLDs - Review of balanced curative rights protections in IGO/INGOs in gTLDs - Review of all rights protection mechanisms currently in gTLDs - Review of balanced rights protection mechanisms for future new gTLD rounds This will avoid misinterpretation... tx you! Best regards, Kathy On 6/7/2016 9:49 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I have integrated your comments and suggestions as well as I could and I think we have a very nice info-graphic right now that we can present in Helsinki.
So I would like to do a last call to see whether you all can live with this.
Of course this will remain a working document, but it would be great if we can show this in Helsinki as work of the CCWP HR.
Looking forward to hear your comments, questions and/or suggestions.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ cc-humanrights mailing list cc-humanrights@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights