Katrina, Fully agree with the content of the letter. Language suggestions: - First sentence “caused by the Board” seems a bit odd, mabe replace by “initiated by the Board”? - Endoresment -> endorsement - Two concurrent processes -> I would add the exact reference to the other process in the text block behind title Best, Peter Peter Vergote Legal & Corp. Affairs Manager +32 16 29 89 28 +32 474 790096 www.dnsbelgium.be<http://www.dnsbelgium.be/> [ns_punt_belgium_rgb] Van: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> namens Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Datum: maandag 24 april 2017 15:49 Aan: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Onderwerp: [ccnso-council] FW: PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2 Dear Councillors, I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific reviews, it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you could share them as well. Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM To: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2 Dear Councillors, During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2 specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As agreed, here’s a draft letter to the Board. Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April. Thank you and have a nice weekend! Kind regards, ]{atrina
