Thanks Gab, I approve to withdraw fax Suggestion : add a systematic mail to be sent to IANA tech and IANA admin e-mails at the end of your process flow, each time when a ccnso application as been approved, and also keep an archive of that mail (and responses if you have any, including "mail delivery failure or issues" when that happen) Best --- Olivier le jeudi 23 octobre à 01 H 46 , Gabriella Schittek a ecrit :
No, we only reply to the email address that is stated in the application and ask for clarification, in case such is needed. If it doesn't get clarified, the application is not considered valid.
Gabi
-----Original Message----- From: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC [mailto:Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:55 AM To: Gabriella Schittek Cc: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC; ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Acceptance of fax applications
Thanks Gabi, sounds very reasonable to me.
Last thing : when the mails of the applicant doesn't come from the ccTLD manager e-mails as registered in the IANA database, is there a request for approval sent to tld-admin and tech-admin e-mails registered in IANA database ?
Best
le jeudi 23 octobre à 00 H 46 , Gabriella Schittek a ecrit :
Olivier,
We check the data in the applications against the data in the IANA database. When we see that the data is corresponding to what's in the database, we're asking IANA for confirmation that they don't have any outstanding issues with the ccTLD. We also send an email to the applicant confirming the receipt of the application (the email is sent to the address stated in the application) and inform them that the council will now vote on the application (if IANA confirms that they have no issues with the ccTLD). This also gives the applicant a chance to protest, should the application have been forged in his/her name.
In some cases, where we see that only some part of the data is correct, we write to the applicant and ask for clarification. Mostly it's based on a misunderstanding and leads to that we ask them to resend the application with the corrected data. Their first application will then be marked in the database with "NAR" (New Application Required).
We receive a lot of spam or bogus applications as well - this is mostly very obvious - then we don't follow any process, only change the status in the archives from "New" to "Sus.Spam".
I hope this clarifies,
Gabi
-----Original Message----- From: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC [mailto:Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:30 AM To: Gabriella Schittek Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Acceptance of fax applications
Hi Gabi,
In principle I would approve that of course.
However, could you remind how we check that the application is coming from a ccTLD manager ? And how we check that there is no forged in applications (aka : which security is implemented in the application process) ?
In short, what's the process flow for application behind this: http://ccnso.icann.org/cgi/application.cgi ?
Thanks,
--- Olivier
le mercredi 22 octobre à 05 H 01 , Gabriella Schittek a ecrit :
Dear Councillors,
An action point from the last Council call was "Action 34-05: The ccNSO Secretariat to send out a summary of the request on ending fax applications to the ccNSO Council list where it will be subject to voting."
I would like to ask for your approval to end the acceptance of fax applications to the ccNSO.
The main reason is that it is problematic to archive such applications. The fax is received in Marina del Rey, needs to be forwarded to me and then there is no real good archiving system for that. The applications submitted via the webform are automatically archived in our web-archives.
I also think that the applicants are skilled enough to fill in the (very basic) web form, and last, but not least - fax applications are quite rare anyway.
Please, can you send your approval/disapproval to this suggestion to this list by next Wednesday, 29th October 2008.
Thanks,
Gabi
-- Olivier
-- Olivier
-- Olivier