Peter, Thanks a lot for your comments!
- First sentence ³caused by the Board² seems a bit odd, mabe replace by ³initiated by the Board²?
Well, that¹s the wording they use in the Bylaws
- Endoresment -> endorsement
Yup, thanks!
- Two concurrent processes -> I would add the exact reference to the other process in the text block behind title
Wanted to keep it as short and simple as possible, but technically it is possible to add footnotes Regards, ]{atrina Van: <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> namens Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> Datum: maandag 24 april 2017 15:49 Aan: "ccnso-council@icann.org" <ccnso-council@icann.org> Onderwerp: [ccnso-council] FW: PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2 Dear Councillors, I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific reviews, it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you could share them as well. Thank you! Kind regards, ]{atrina From: ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Katrina Sataki Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM To: ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2 Dear Councillors, During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2 specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As agreed, here¹s a draft letter to the Board. Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April. Thank you and have a nice weekend! Kind regards, ]{atrina