Greetings all. First, thank you Joke for hitting me over the head with this additional reminder regarding this matter. To my fellow Council members: My gut is telling me that we should have (at least) a representative (“observer”?) on this GNSO PDP. Perhaps I am mis-understanding what the GNSO means by “Transfer” in their sphere, in which case my concerns might well be mis-placed. However, from my position as the chair of the two WG’s involved in ccTLD Retirement policy and subsequent Review Mechanisms, I think there is a need for involvement in what the GNSO is about to embark on, at least informally. Best Regards, /Stephen From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> Date: Monday, February 15, 2021 at 07:33 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Triage Recommendation 01-2021 Dear Councilors, You might have seen the email forwarded by Katrina to the Council mailing list on Monday, 8 February 2021 regarding the GNSO PDP to review the gTLD Transfer Policy. Kindly find the recommendationby the Triage Committee in the google doc below. https://bit.ly/2HPKKFE If you do not agree with the recommendation, kindly let me know at your earliest convenience, latest by 16 February 2021 (23:59 UTC) Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org