Sorry for late reply . I am more in favor of participating in the RDS-WHOIS2 and help define the undefined scope. I am little concern if ccNSO got left out of the process now and it would be challenging to catch up after May 2018 (date that com/net transferring into THICK). We may also suggest ccNSO member to join as individual participant. On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
I know you have time until 28 April but I would appreciate your (at least initial) responses by tomorrow 12 UTC. Tomorrow we (Byron, Demi and I) have a call with Goran Marby. In case he raises issues around specific reviews, it would be nice to know if there is a support for the arguments mentioned in the draft. If you come up with other arguments, I would appreciate if you could share them as well.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
*From:* ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@ icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Katrina Sataki *Sent:* Friday, April 21, 2017 4:09 PM *To:* ccnso-council@icann.org *Subject:* [ccnso-council] PLEASE COMMENT: ccNSO in RDS-WHOIS2
Dear Councillors,
During our call last week we discussed our participation in the RDS-WHOIS2 specific review. We decided to defer our participation due to the fact that many things, including the scope, around this review are still unclear. As agreed, here’s a draft letter to the Board.
Please have a look and send your comments by 28 April.
Thank you and have a nice weekend!
Kind regards,
]{atrina
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council
-- Ching Chiao Founder & CEO Brandma Internet Group 中域国际集团 www.brandma.com +886.918.211372 || +86.135.2018.7032 || +1.908.4990050 Beijing . Chengdu . Hangzhou . Hong Kong . Shenzhen. Taipei