Glad to see we're in general agreement. - Young-eum Lee. Sent from my iPhone
On 2014. 3. 27., at 12:06, Lesley Cowley <lesley@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
Thanks Keith. We will have plenty more opportunities to make statements, I'm sure. Kind regards Lesley
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Mar 2014, at 12:02, "Keith Davidson" <keith@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
OK, if its not clear to us, then its going to dilute the message we give to them, so lets delete it... I am paying the price for not having participated and understanding the rest of the drafting teams words - so lets revert to the initially circulated text.
Cheers
Keith
On 27/03/2014 4:41 p.m., Lesley Cowley wrote: Hi,
I am a bit concerned about deviating too much from the text we presented to the ccNSO yesterday. Particularly, I do not recall us having discussed a 'competitive root within a privatised and competitive DNS' nor the danger of 'fracturing due to rushing to solutions'/'ICANN not having to provide absolute answers'.
Kind regards, Lesley ________________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] on behalf of Keith Davidson [keith@internetnz.net.nz] Sent: 27 March 2014 03:29 To: Byron Holland; ccnso-council@icann.org Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Proposed statement
I like the structure and tone, but wonder if 6) could be worded a little more assertively, and that some of the other asides might be worth capturing also. I have worked a rough redraft attached, and wonder if this might be smoothed for style and language and incorporated into the statement.
Cheers
Keith
On 27/03/2014 1:30 p.m., Byron Holland wrote: Dear Councillors,
Attached is a soft copy of the draft text I handed out yesterday. It is my intention to make this statement at the open session later today.
As noted yesterday, if you have any suggestions, please advise my noon today.
All the best,
Byron .