Re: [ccnso-members] Re: [ccnso-council] Board comments on CCWG Proposal
Dec. 15, 2015
8:16 a.m.
Hi Jordan It is nice to be back on the same page with you! On 15/12/2015 08:35, "Jordan Carter" <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
Fixing this now, of course, creates substantial delays. Unless we can agree that it would be adjusted in WS2.
I disagree. The report current indicates different processes. I think language needs to be inserted that confirms the key difference is that the IANA budget veto process will focus primarily on the IANA customers. That would suffice for me. Mike
3846
Age (days ago)
3846
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Mike Silber