Dear all, You are kindly requested to vote on the resolution on the adoption of the charter of the Technical working group. Please send a vote in favour, abstention or against the resolution by Thursday 3 December 2010. The updated charter is included. Thank you and kind regards, Bart Resolution Background: At its meeting in Mexico city on 4 March 2009, the ccNSO Council resolved to close the IANA working group. At the same meeting the Council resolved to review the scope of the Technical Working Group to ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues. At the Seoul meeting the chair of the Technical working group proposed a charter to accommodate the Council's resolution. During its meeting in Seoul the Council discussed the proposed charter. Two issues needed to be addressed: Language in the charter relating to observers - Change from 'lurkers" to "observers" - and, seeking new members. During the Seoul meeting the Tech WG members reached out for new members, who were added. The WG in particular looked for people with firm technical and/or operational knowledge and experience. Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the charter of the Tech working group, as proposed by the chair of the Tech Working Group.
Hi Bart, owner-ccnso-council@icann.org wrote on 30/11/2009 12:10:33:
You are kindly requested to vote on the resolution on the adoption of the charter of the Technical working group. Please send a vote in favour, abstention or against the resolution by Thursday 3 December 2010. The updated charter is included.
Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? Regards, Lesley
Hi Lesley, Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter. 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart
All, I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don't need to keep re-visiting. a) I don't think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think? b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will 'usually' Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> ceo@auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21 To: Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi Lesley, Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter. 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4647 (20091129) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Hi Chris, "Chris Disspain" <ceo@auda.org.au> wrote on 30/11/2009 23:31:04:
a) I don?t think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think?
Agreed.
b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will ?usually? Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think?
Agreed also. Regards, Lesley
Hi, My answer to the questions below: 1) Agreed 2) Agreed And again, my apologies for the inconvenience this has caused. Best regards, Byron From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: November 30, 2009 6:31 PM To: 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Lesley Cowley' Cc: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> All, I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don't need to keep re-visiting. a) I don't think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think? b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will 'usually' Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21 To: Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi Lesley, Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter. 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4647 (20091129) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
I agree on both as well ________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Byron Holland Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:43 AM To: Chris Disspain; 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Lesley Cowley' Cc: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi, My answer to the questions below: 1) Agreed 2) Agreed And again, my apologies for the inconvenience this has caused. Best regards, Byron From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: November 30, 2009 6:31 PM To: 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Lesley Cowley' Cc: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> All, I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don't need to keep re-visiting. a) I don't think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think? b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will 'usually' Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> www.auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21 To: Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi Lesley, Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter. 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4647 (20091129) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Agree on both. Oscar ________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Burr, Becky Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:10 AM To: Byron Holland; Chris Disspain; Bart Boswinkel; Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> I agree on both as well ________________________________ From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Byron Holland Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:43 AM To: Chris Disspain; 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Lesley Cowley' Cc: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi, My answer to the questions below: 1) Agreed 2) Agreed And again, my apologies for the inconvenience this has caused. Best regards, Byron From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain Sent: November 30, 2009 6:31 PM To: 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Lesley Cowley' Cc: 'ccNSO Council' Subject: RE: [ccnso-council] <no subject> All, I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don't need to keep re-visiting. a) I don't think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think? b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will 'usually' Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd ceo@auda.org.au<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/> Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21 To: Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Hi Lesley, Two quick questions: 1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity? BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter. 2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4647 (20091129) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:31:04 +1100 (EST) "Chris Disspain" <ceo@auda.org.au> wrote:
All,
I think, on balance, we should try to get this right so we don't need to keep re-visiting.
a) I don't think Norm can remain on the WG unless he has some formal capacity in which to do so. What do others think?
I agree.
b) Given that Eberhard has chaired this WG for some considerable time I see no reason to change that especially as the rules say a council member will 'usually' Chair. Having said that I do think we should consider having a co-chair that is a council member. What do others think?
I agree. Hiro
Cheers,
Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
au Domain Administration Ltd
<mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> ceo@auda.org.au
<http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au
Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 05:21 To: Lesley Cowley Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] <no subject>
Hi Lesley,
Two quick questions:
1. I understand that Norm Ritchie is no longer with CIRA and as he was co-chair, this means the charter we would be approving would already be out of date - or was he intending on remaining in this capacity?
BB: . The charter was send to me prior to Norm leaving CIRA, and hence was not included in the charter.
2. Under the rules of the ccNSO, section 7.2 on committees, we say that 'members of the ccNSO Council will usually chair any standing or permanent committees established'. We have previously applied this rule to WG, such as the IANA WG, so should it not also apply here? or are we proposing that relaxing that rule? BB: As the Tech WG was only asked to propose a charter to "ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues", the chairmanship of the wg was not revisited. Please note that the Tech wg was established at the Wellington meeting in March 2006 prior to the adoption of the guidelines. Kind regards, Bart
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4647 (20091129) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
In favor. Patricio Poblete Bart Boswinkel wrote:
Dear all, You are kindly requested to vote on the resolution on the adoption of the charter of the Technical working group. Please send a vote in favour, abstention or against the resolution by Thursday 3 December 2010. The updated charter is included. Thank you and kind regards, Bart
Resolution Background: At its meeting in Mexico city on 4 March 2009, the ccNSO Council resolved to close the IANA working group. At the same meeting the Council resolved to review the scope of the Technical Working Group to ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues. At the Seoul meeting the chair of the Technical working group proposed a charter to accommodate the Council's resolution. During its meeting in Seoul the Council discussed the proposed charter. Two issues needed to be addressed: Language in the charter relating to observers - Change from 'lurkers" to "observers" - and, seeking new members. During the Seoul meeting the Tech WG members reached out for new members, who were added. The WG in particular looked for people with firm technical and/or operational knowledge and experience.
Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the charter of the Tech working group, as proposed by the chair of the Tech Working Group.
In favour, Juhani -----Original Message----- From: owner-ccnso-council@icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel Sent: 30. marraskuuta 2009 14:11 To: ccNSO Council Subject: [ccnso-council] <no subject> Dear all, You are kindly requested to vote on the resolution on the adoption of the charter of the Technical working group. Please send a vote in favour, abstention or against the resolution by Thursday 3 December 2010. The updated charter is included. Thank you and kind regards, Bart Resolution Background: At its meeting in Mexico city on 4 March 2009, the ccNSO Council resolved to close the IANA working group. At the same meeting the Council resolved to review the scope of the Technical Working Group to ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues. At the Seoul meeting the chair of the Technical working group proposed a charter to accommodate the Council's resolution. During its meeting in Seoul the Council discussed the proposed charter. Two issues needed to be addressed: Language in the charter relating to observers - Change from 'lurkers" to "observers" - and, seeking new members. During the Seoul meeting the Tech WG members reached out for new members, who were added. The WG in particular looked for people with firm technical and/or operational knowledge and experience. Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the charter of the Tech working group, as proposed by the chair of the Tech Working Group.
Re. Tech-WG Charter : I vote in favor. Hiro. On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:10:33 -0800 Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, You are kindly requested to vote on the resolution on the adoption of the charter of the Technical working group. Please send a vote in favour, abstention or against the resolution by Thursday 3 December 2010. The updated charter is included. Thank you and kind regards, Bart
Resolution Background: At its meeting in Mexico city on 4 March 2009, the ccNSO Council resolved to close the IANA working group. At the same meeting the Council resolved to review the scope of the Technical Working Group to ensure that it is mandated and capable of undertaking continuing work with IANA on outstanding issues. At the Seoul meeting the chair of the Technical working group proposed a charter to accommodate the Council's resolution. During its meeting in Seoul the Council discussed the proposed charter. Two issues needed to be addressed: Language in the charter relating to observers - Change from 'lurkers" to "observers" - and, seeking new members. During the Seoul meeting the Tech WG members reached out for new members, who were added. The WG in particular looked for people with firm technical and/or operational knowledge and experience.
Proposed decision: the ccNSO Council adopts the charter of the Tech working group, as proposed by the chair of the Tech Working Group.
participants (9)
-
Bart Boswinkel -
Burr, Becky -
Byron Holland -
Chris Disspain -
HiroHOTTA -
Juselius Juhani -
Lesley Cowley -
Oscar A. Robles-Garay -
Patricio Poblete