Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2
Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.
Thanks Bart! This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote:
Thanks Bart!
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
+1 Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua
On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best,
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote: Thanks Bart!
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
Draft Resolution
Background
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
Decision
To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws.
The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
+1 Support. Jiankang Yao From: Javier Rua via Ccnso-council Date: 2021-06-01 08:04 To: Pablo Rodriguez CC: ccnso-council Subject: Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 +1 Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best, This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote: Thanks Bart! This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
+1 Marie-Noémie De : Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Javier Rua via Ccnso-council Envoyé : mardi 1 juin 2021 02:04 À : Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc : Objet : Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 +1 Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best, [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1fgU_HWyW1jdo1Rcr47BMNa6Yn1FkQ...] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr<mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> wrote: Thanks Bart! [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1fgU_HWyW1jdo1Rcr47BMNa6Yn1FkQ...] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Dear Bart, Thanks for the update. +1. [cid:d7fcee51-bc6c-4c08-a45e-87c21301a5c5] ________________________________ De: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> en nombre de marienoemie.marques--- via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> Enviado: martes, 1 de junio de 2021 4:35 a. m. Para: Javier Rua <javrua@gmail.com>; Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc: ccnso-council@icann.org <ccnso-council@icann.org> Asunto: Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 +1 Marie-Noémie De : Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Javier Rua via Ccnso-council Envoyé : mardi 1 juin 2021 02:04 À : Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> Cc : Objet : Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 +1 Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best, [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1fgU_HWyW1jdo1Rcr47BMNa6Yn1FkQ...] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr<mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> wrote: Thanks Bart! [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1fgU_HWyW1jdo1Rcr47BMNa6Yn1FkQ...] This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org<mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ***************Este mensaje (y sus adjuntos), en adelante "mensaje", ha sido enviado exclusivamente a su(s) destinatario(s) y es confidencial. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor bórrelo y comunique inmediatamente al remitente. Toda utilización o publicación, total o parcial, queda prohibida salvo autorización expresa. La UTP no podrá ser considerada responsable si el mensaje ha sido modificado y/o utilizado sin autorización. This message (and any attachments), are confidential intended solely for the people whose addresses appear. If you have received this message by error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use, dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, without formal approval is prohibited. The UTP will not therefore be liable for the message if modified and/or used without approval.************** ***************Este mensaje (y sus adjuntos), en adelante "mensaje", ha sido enviado exclusivamente a su(s) destinatario(s) y es confidencial. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor bórrelo y comunique inmediatamente al remitente. Toda utilización o publicación, total o parcial, queda prohibida salvo autorización expresa. La UTP no podrá ser considerada responsable si el mensaje ha sido modificado y/o utilizado sin autorización. This message (and any attachments), are confidential intended solely for the people whose addresses appear. If you have received this message by error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use, dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, without formal approval is prohibited. The UTP will not therefore be liable for the message if modified and/or used without approval.**************
Hi, Bart! I'm also in favor best demi On 01/06/2021 10:25, Jenifer Lopez via Ccnso-council wrote:
DearBart,
Thanks for the update.
+1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *De:* Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> en nombre de marienoemie.marques--- via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Enviado:* martes, 1 de junio de 2021 4:35 a. m. *Para:* Javier Rua <javrua@gmail.com>; Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> *Cc:* ccnso-council@icann.org <ccnso-council@icann.org> *Asunto:* Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2
+1
Marie-Noémie
*De :*Ccnso-council [mailto:ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org] *De la part de* Javier Rua via Ccnso-council *Envoyé :* mardi 1 juin 2021 02:04 *À :* Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> *Cc :* *Objet :* Re: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2
+1
Javier Rúa-Jovet
+1-787-396-6511
twitter: @javrua
skype: javier.rua1
https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua <https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua>
On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Bart,
Thank you for the update.
I support the resolution and decision.
All the best,
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr <mailto:pablo@nic.pr>> wrote:
Thanks Bart!
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*/Background/*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
* The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*/Decision /*
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3^rd ) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
**
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org <mailto:Ccnso-council@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ***************Este mensaje (y sus adjuntos), en adelante "mensaje", ha sido enviado exclusivamente a su(s) destinatario(s) y es confidencial. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor bórrelo y comunique inmediatamente al remitente. Toda utilización o publicación, total o parcial, queda prohibida salvo autorización expresa. La UTP no podrá ser considerada responsable si el mensaje ha sido modificado y/o utilizado sin autorización. This message (and any attachments), are confidential intended solely for the people whose addresses appear. If you have received this message by error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use, dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, without formal approval is prohibited. The UTP will not therefore be liable for the message if modified and/or used without approval.************** ***************Este mensaje (y sus adjuntos), en adelante "mensaje", ha sido enviado exclusivamente a su(s) destinatario(s) y es confidencial. Si usted recibe este mensaje por error, por favor bórrelo y comunique inmediatamente al remitente. Toda utilización o publicación, total o parcial, queda prohibida salvo autorización expresa. La UTP no podrá ser considerada responsable si el mensaje ha sido modificado y/o utilizado sin autorización. This message (and any attachments), are confidential intended solely for the people whose addresses appear. If you have received this message by error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use, dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, without formal approval is prohibited. The UTP will not therefore be liable for the message if modified and/or used without approval.**************
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
In case not recorded: approve separation as recommended. Javier Rúa-Jovet +1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua
On May 31, 2021, at 8:04 PM, Javier Rua <javrua@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Javier Rúa-Jovet
+1-787-396-6511 twitter: @javrua skype: javier.rua1 https://www.linkedin.com/in/javrua
On May 31, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Pablo Rodriguez via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Bart, Thank you for the update. I support the resolution and decision. All the best,
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46 AM Pablo Rodriguez <pablo@nic.pr> wrote: Thanks Bart!
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 4:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council <ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote: Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
Draft Resolution
Background
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
Decision
To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws.
The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks Bart I support Jordan On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 20:50, Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Jordan Carter Group Chief Executive, InternetNZ +64-21-442-649 -|- jordan@InternetNZ.net.nz Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
Dear Bart, I support regards ai-chin -----Original message----- From:Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council<ccnso-council@icann.org> To:ccNSO-Council@icann.org<ccNSO-Council@icann.org> Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 16:50:06 Subject: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1and Part 2 Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. _______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thank you Bart. Ok for me too. Kindest Regards, Laura Margolis El lun, 31 may 2021 a las 5:50, Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council (< ccnso-council@icann.org>) escribió:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Laura Margolis +598 99690992 skype: lauri.margolis
Dear Bart I am in favor Souleymane Le lun. 31 mai 2021 à 08:50, Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> a écrit :
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear All I support the separation of part 1 and part 2 of the ccPDP3. Best regards, Alejandra -- [image: Photograph] *Alejandra Reynoso*Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt *P:* +502 23688565 *E:* alejandra.reynoso@cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
I support the separation of the part 1 and part 2 of the ccPDP3. Thanks Biyi Oladipo On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 9:50 AM Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Dear Bart, I support the separation of part 1 and part 2 of the ccPDP3. Souleymane Le lun. 31 mai 2021 à 08:50, Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council < ccnso-council@icann.org> a écrit :
Dear all,
Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by *Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC* .
For your reference, I have included the note again as well.
Kind regards,
Bart
-----------------
*Draft Resolution*
*Background*
In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2).
In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP.
The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons:
- The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. - The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. - Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process.
*Decision *
*To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. *
*The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication. *
_______________________________________________ Ccnso-council mailing list Ccnso-council@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Bart I support the separation as per the resolution. Best wishes Nick From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Bart Boswinkel via Ccnso-council Sent: Monday, May 31, 2021 9:50 AM To: ccNSO-Council@icann.org Subject: [ccnso-council] Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.
Dear all, I am pleased to inform you that all Councillors have voted and the resolution was passed unanimously!! Today we will publish the resolution and the separation note. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication Kind regards, Bart From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org> Date: Friday, 28 May 2021 at 19:01 To: "ccNSO-Council@icann.org" <ccNSO-Council@icann.org> Subject: Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2 Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.
participants (15)
-
aclu -
Alejandra Reynoso -
Bart Boswinkel -
Biyi Oladipo -
Demi Getschko -
Javier Rua -
Jenifer Lopez -
Jiankang Yao -
Jordan Carter -
Laura Margolis -
marienoemie.marques＠orange.com -
Nick Wenban-Smith -
Pablo Rodriguez -
Souleymane Oumtanaga -
ALI Ha dji Mmadi