Hello Paulos,

when will it be enough for you Chris – so that you will say no even if nominated?

Thanks for the question. ICANN directors are limited to 3 terms for the very reasons you have outlined in your note. The term for which I have just been nominated will therefore be my last. I know it sounds trite to say that I serve at the behest of the ccNSO but it is true. Cheers, Chris

On 28 Oct 2016, at 00:20, Dr Paulos Nyirenda <paulos@sdnp.org.mw> wrote:

Thank you Mathieu for starting this question session and thanks Chris and others for the initial answers. I also have a question or two that have been nagging me on this.

It is often observed in my region, Africa, and maybe less often in other regions as well, that a sizeable number of leaders overstay in their positions by taking advantage of the law or indeed by manipulating the law to stay in power for a period that appears oversize or beyond limits or beyond "normal"

Such leaders often claim to be liked or to be doing a good job based on the opinions of a few close friends who seem to be convincing the leader of this and who continue to nominate and/or promote such leaders for their own good as the power of the leader “brushes” on them. In such cases it takes considerable effort to effect positive change, with efforts in many cases turning bloody.

Unfortunately, in my observation, this ccNSO election to the Board in this case is similar to such cases, and it has been nagging me. So, unfortunately, your saying that you would resign if “a majority of the ccNSO members had lost confidence” does not bring relief to my nagging because it is the same as what such leaders say. I also guess that such concerns form the basis or reason some asked earlier if you would accept the Board seat nomination.

So my question is – when will it be enough for you Chris – so that you will say no even if nominated? I am aware that you do a good job at the Board for the ccNSO as others have already commented but that is not enough to overstay, overstaying sometimes suppresses those who could do just as good a job or even better. I am not saying this for me BUT I am sure the probability is one that there is someone out there who could do as well or better. This is the reason the participation issue was raised earlier by others on this issue.

Legalised term limits help but I guess the leaders, their lawyers or close friends already have answers for that in this case and in many cases like this of leaders that I have cited above. Apologies for the long e-mail but my question remains.

Regards,

Paulos ====================== Dr Paulos B Nyirenda NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD http://www.registrar.mw

...

On 27 Oct 2016 at 18:38, Chris Disspain wrote:

Hello Mathieu, All,

Thank you Mathieu for reaching out to ask these questions. I'm sorry that we will not be able to chat face to face in Hyderabad.

1. What would, in your opinion, be reasonable grounds for the ccNSO to initiate a process to remove a ccNSO appointed Board member ?

I think, in simple terms, if the Board member has lost the confidence of the majority of the ccNSO members (for whatever reason) then that would be reasonable grounds. That said, if I was the board member in whom a majority of the ccNSO members had lost confidence, I can assure you that I would resign without requiring the ccNSO to go through the Board member removal process under the new by-laws.

2. Are you going to run for the Chair position ? Will you, in case you are elected, consider that it changes any of your commitments to the ccNSO ?

Not this year. I cannot say what I will do next year because I do not, at this stage, know. However, if I were Chair then whilst it would mean a greater time commitment, I do not believe that it would in any way alter my commitments to the ccNSO.

3. What are your commitments to the ccNSO ?

I am as passionate as I have always been about the ccNSO and its role in the ICANN model including that it provides legitimacy to ICANN in a way that gTLDs cannot because of their contractual obligations. I am immensely proud of what the ccNSO has become and what it has done along the way. I have played a small part in some of those things (IDNs and the fast track being the one to which I am most emotionally attached) and am delighted to be able to continue my association. As a Board member I have striven and will continue to strive to maintain my connection with the ccNSO and ccTLD community. It is very easy to become detached because of the amount of time (especially during ICANN meetings) that the Board spends ‘in its own company' or in the company of other SOs and ACs. It is my intention to continue to work hard to ensure that this does not happen with me.

In practical terms my commitment is to ensure that the views of the ccNSO and the ccTLD community are, when required, vigorously advocated to the board and that whatever decision the Board may make on an issue that concerns ccTLDs, they have a crystal clear understanding of the views the ccTLD community and the likely consequences of any decision they make.

I hope this answers your questions. I will be happy to provide more information or answer further or supplementary questions.

Cheers,

Chris

On 27 Oct 2016, at 17:16, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:

Dear Colleagues, Dear Chris,

First of all congratulations for your nomination. ICANN will certainly benefit from your long-standing expertise of ICANN as well as your experience of the ccTLD manager position and, on the personal side, it will provide us many more opportunities to collaborate and… have drinks !

In advance of the Q&A session planned in Hyderabad (which I will only attend remotely), I would like to ask you some questions. The reason why I am asking these questions is that I hope we can use this exchange to strengthen the relationship between the ccNSO community and its representatives on the Board, especially in light of the recent “empowerment” of the community. I would appreciate a written response, so that our community can keep track of the associated elements.

So here are my questions :

1. What would, in your opinion, be reasonable grounds for the ccNSO to initiate a process to remove a ccNSO appointed Board member ? 2. Are you going to run for the Chair position ? Will you, in case you are elected, consider that it changes any of your commitments to the ccNSO ? 3. What are your commitments to the ccNSO ?

I am happy to elaborate if anything was unclear, and thank you again for your commitment.

Best Mathieu

De : cctldcommunity-bounces@cctld-managers.org [mailto:cctldcommunity-bounces@cctld-managers.org] De la part de Joke Braeken Envoyé : mercredi 19 octobre 2016 12:26 À : ccnso-council@icann.org ; ccnso-members@icann.org; ccTLDcommunity@cctld-managers.org Objet : Re: [ccTLDcommunity] Call for Nominations Director ICANN Board seat 11 closed

Dear All,

The Q&A session is scheduled on SUNDAY, 6 November, between 15:15 and 16:45 local time in Hall 5. (And not Monday, as mentioned in my previous email.) Apologies for the confusion.

Best regards,

Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org

Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

From: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org> Date: Wednesday 19 October 2016 at 12:14 To: "ccnso-council@icann.org " <ccnso-council@icann.org>, "ccnso-members@icann.org" <ccnso-members@icann.org>, "ccTLDcommunity@cctld-managers.org" <ccTLDcommunity@cctld-managers.org> Subject: Call for Nominations Director ICANN Board seat 11 closed

Dear All,

Yesterday, Tuesday 18 October 2016 23.59 UTC the call for nominations for a Director to the ICANN Board (seat 11) was closed, as per the announcement located on https://ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-27sep16-en.htm

Chris Disspain, in accordance to the applicable rules, was nominated, seconded and has accepted his Nomination. All Nominations and Secondments can be found here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/ccnso-boardnominations

At the Q&A session in Hyderabad, there will be an opportunity for the ccTLD community to interact with Chris. The session is scheduled on Monday, 6 November, between 15:15 and 16:45 local time in Hall 5. See agenda ccNSO Members Days: https://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/hyderabad57/agenda.htm For remote participants: https://participate.icann.org/hyd57-hall5

Do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions.

Best regards,

Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken@icann.org

Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7859 / Virus Database: 4664/13289 - Release Date: 10/27/16

---------------------------------------------------------- Malawi SDNP Webmail: http://www.sdnp.org.mw Access your Malawi SDNP e-mail from anywhere in the world. ----------------------------------------------------------