Dear Eberhard, dear Masha, dear All Thank you very much for the feedback, Eberhard and Masha. Here is a summary of the proposed changes compared to the previous session proposal circulated. Unless there are any concerns raised by the end of the week (Friday, 30 January, COB), the suggestion is to move forward with implementing this proposal. * The session will now be held in block 3, and will have a 75 min. duration, as suggested by Eberhard * Sameer Gahlot, Research Associate at NIXI has confirmed his availability, and so did Arnt. As Regina will not attend ICANN85 in person, would you be available to chair the session, @Abdalmonem Galila<mailto:atharwat@tra.gov.eg> ? * UAC previously requested to accommodate additional speakers. With a 75 min. session, one additional presenter could be included. See the proposal below. @Vadim Mikhaylov<mailto:mva@cctld.ru> does this work, from your perspective? * Regarding the discussion, the proposal would be to focus on how AI can be applied to address UA challenges. Please note: The UAC meeting initially scheduled for tomorrow, 28 January will be deferred by one week (same time). The planning team and confirmed presenters will be invited to join the session in Mumbai, as well as next week’s planning meeting. Duration Time local Topic Who Speaker Status 2 min. housekeeping Secretariat 2 min. Intro by Session chair Abdalmonem Galila, Egypt IDN ccTLD and UAC Chair TBD 15 min. What is the current status? a1/ technical UA readiness for the .in ccTLD manager Sameer Gahlot, .in confirmed 15 min. What is the current status? a2/ technical UA readiness for the .ru ccTLD manager Vadim Mikhailov, .ru suggested by planning team. not yet invited 15 min. What is the current status? b/ Overview of current developments, “open source” and RFC 9873 Arnt Gulbrandsen, ICANN confirmed 30 min. Roundtable: presenters, panelists, audience. Discussion moderated by Session chair * Can AI meaningfully advance UA readiness and/or adoption? * If so, how can AI be applied to address UA challenges? * How is this relevant to ccTLDs? Potential panel members: * Edmon Chung, * Michael Bauland, Knipp (Chair LD PDP) * Sameer Gahlot, .in * Vadim Mikhailov, .ru * Sami Mohamed Ali, .bh (Expert Group) suggested by planning team. not yet invited 5 min. Wrap-up by session chair See above TBD Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> From: Maria Kolesnikova <masha@cctld.ru> Date: Monday, 26 January 2026 at 17:00 To: "ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org" <ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org> Cc: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org>, 'Eberhard W Lisse' <el@lisse.NA>, "ccNSO-techday@icann.org" <ccNSO-techday@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: [ccNSO-UACommittee] Tech Day roundtable on Universal Acceptance (Monday 9 March, block 4) Dear All, Are we planning to discuss the proposed way forward regarding the joint UAC and Tech WG session at ICANN85 at the nearest UAC call this week? I’d like to clarify some moments: 1. If we consider “AI for UA” as the main topic for the RT, then what aspects of AI we are going to discuss? 2. As this is the Tech session, I’d suggest to replace me by Vadim Mikhailov (infrastructure consultant at .ru/.рф registry) as he is a technical expert and will better fit to this discussion. On AI aspects or others. See you all at the call. Best, Maria Kolesnikova From: Joke Braeken via ccNSO-UACommittee <ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 6:18 PM To: ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org; Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>; ccNSO-techday@icann.org Subject: [ccNSO-UACommittee] Tech Day roundtable on Universal Acceptance (Monday 9 March, block 4) Dear UAC members, dear Eberhard and Tech WG members, Thanks all for the suggestions and feedback you provided. Based on the input received, Bart prepared a proposed way forward regarding the joint UAC and Tech WG session at ICANN85. I am forwarding on his behalf, as he is currently have some e-mail issues. Duration Time local Topic Who Speaker Status 2 min. housekeeping Secretariat 2 min. Intro by Session chair Either Regina, Abdalmonem, or Sami? TBD 10 min. What is the current status? a/ impact UA readiness case India NIXI, or someone suggested by NIXI? TBD 15 min. What is the current status? b/ Overview of current developments “open source” and RFC 9873 Arnt Gulbrandsen? TBD 30 min. Roundtable: presenters, panelists, audience. Discussion moderated by Session chair * AI support UA and how? * What is most promising area in your view ? * How would this affect the industry? · Edmon Chung, chair Member UA Expert group · Michael Bauland, · Maria Kolesnikova TBD 5 min. Wrap-up by session chair See above TBD Please find further details in the draft briefing paper for this session: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sYD681KXEjM-eLyHZwDckqN3syQLF4sAK-VVHQfq... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1sYD681KXEjM-e...> Please send any feedback at your earliest convenience, in reply to all, latest by next week Monday, COB. Thank you. Best regards. Joke Braeken joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> From: Maria Kolesnikova <masha@cctld.ru<mailto:masha@cctld.ru>> Date: Thursday, 15 January 2026 at 16:28 To: "ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org>" <ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org>>, Joke Braeken <joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Cc: "el@lisse.NA<mailto:el@lisse.NA>" <el@lisse.NA<mailto:el@lisse.NA>> Subject: [Ext] FW: [ccNSO-UACommittee] Re: Tech Day roundtable on Universal Acceptance (Monday 9 March, block 4) + ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-uacommittee@icann.org> From: Maria Kolesnikova <masha@cctld.ru<mailto:masha@cctld.ru>> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2026 6:20 PM To: 'Joke Braeken' <joke.braeken@icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org>>; 'Bart Boswinkel' <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Cc: 'el@lisse.na' <el@lisse.na<mailto:el@lisse.na>> Subject: RE: [ccNSO-UACommittee] Re: Tech Day roundtable on Universal Acceptance (Monday 9 March, block 4) Dear all, I would like to suggest the following potential topics/speakers for UAC + Tech Day (Monday 9 March, block 4), for your consideration: 1. It would be good to ask NIXI or another representative from the host country to make overview of their EAI project in Rajasthan with the main focus on the current status/how many EAI addresses are in real use now/what problems have been faced/what results have been achieved and other possible details. More on the RajMail project here: https://uasg.tech/2018/12/rajasthan-states-new-email-project-brings-millions... [uasg.tech]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/uasg.tech/2018/12/rajasthan-states-new-em...> This project could be a good example of how to implement EAI with government support. 1. A new Request for Comments has become available in online RFC libraries recently. It concerns EPP Protocol and EAI thematic. As variant, we could ask one of its authors to talk about the main scope of this new RFC. RFC 9873 Title: Additional Email Address Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Author: D. Belyavsky, J. Gould, S. Hollenbeck Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2025 Mailbox: beldmit@gmail.com<mailto:beldmit@gmail.com>, jgould@verisign.com<mailto:jgould@verisign.com>, shollenbeck@verisign.com<mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com> Pages: 22 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-27.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9873 [rfc-editor.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9873__;!!PtGJa...> DOI: 10.17487/RFC9873 The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) does not inherently support internationalized email addresses because the specifications for these addresses did not exist when EPP was developed. This document describes a command-response extension that adds support for associating an additional email address with an EPP contact object. That additional email address can be either an internationalized email address or an ASCII-only address. 1. Presentation on the latest technical developments re UA readiness with the main focus on the world’s big tech companies (Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc.) + the most popular open source software (particularly, manufacturers of mail software with EAI support) + manufacturers of hosting panels (Cpanel, Plesk, etc.) could be provided by Arnt Gulbrandsen arnt.gulbrandsen@icann.org<mailto:arnt.gulbrandsen@icann.org> probably. He is from the ICANN technical staff. Although, I believe it’s better to check with Arnt if he is providing any similar update at another ICANN85’s Prep week or the meeting sections. If not, then this update would be very useful for the ccNSO and more broader ICANN community. We also discussed that the UA Roadmap for registries and registrars, developed by ICANN (https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-publishes-ua-roadmap-fo...), could be of some interest for ccTLDs, so ICANN staff could cover this topic, too. For this, we could at least ask Arnt to shortly remind about this document for ccTLDs during his speech, if there is no enough time for a separate speaker at the Tech Day section Block 4 (60 min). As a variant, the UA roadmap could become a basis for a separate technical webinar/training by ICANN for ccTLDs, gTLDs and registrars on how to make their registries/registration systems UA Ready…just thoughts. 1. If we want to cover ccTLD or gTLD cases re UA Readiness, I could suggest our Cyrillic IDN TLD .РФ story. We have implemented EAI support in most parts of our infrastructure and also are planning this year to add EAI support into the registry. The Coordination Center for TLD .RU/.РФ or the Technical Center of Internet’s speaker could present this topic in details. Hope it helps. Maria From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, 13 January 2026 at 13:46 To: ccNSO-UACommittee <ccnso-uacommittee-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ccnso-uacommittee-bounces@icann.org>> Cc: "el@lisse.na<mailto:el@lisse.na>" <el@lisse.na<mailto:el@lisse.na>> Subject: Tech Day roundtable on Universal Acceptance (Monday 9 March, block 4) Dear all, As you will recall from last meetings before the break, the UAC needs to agree on proposal on the format and presenters for the roundtable during Tech Day in Mumbai. To date the following was discussed: * Presentation from Nixi or other organization involved in technical aspects of UA in India (presenter to be identified) * Presentation on latest technical developments re UA readiness. Proposal for discussion * Assuming UA is relevant for TLD operators, presentation and discussion on current state of play and what needs to happen to make a registry UA ready from a technical operational perspective. Invite members of ICANN UA technical expert group, and one or two registry operators (cccTLD and gTLD) Suggest this is main topic for discussion tomorrow on the UA call Kind regards, Bart