That's also an arguement for not using a term that has a very specific carefully defined meaning. No matter how much you tell people you are using a different meaning, the base one will be presumed. Alan -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos. On November 22, 2019 9:37:57 PM EST, Sam Lanfranco <sam@lanfranco.net> wrote: Alan, We are pretty much on the same page here. The overall text makes it clear that we are not restricting grants (even "baskets" would involve more than one (-: ) My simple solution would be a term in the glossary (or, as you say, a footnote). Sam On 11/22/2019 9:30 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote: Sam, In my mind, ANY term is likely to have some problems, so I agree that we need to pick a term but then qualify what we mean. In most cases where we use the term, we also qualify or expand it with expressions like :under-represented countries" or "underserved populations" As has been pointed, where we are targetting such populations, we are also aiming at disadvantaged populations that may reside within a higher-income contry. So pick something, but then with a foot note of more formal definition make it clear what we mean. Also note that we are not RESTRICTING grants to such groups but merely targeting them. Alan <deleted>