Hello all (I'll most probably be late on the phone today, I have long standing medical appointment I can't miss 20min before our call starts). Regarding the draft conclusions, I agree with most of them, but I'm not sure what "directly related to the ICANN mission" really means at this point, since the document also uses "in service of", or "consistent with" as a constraint elsewhere. Is there a sense of priority or distance to ICANN implied between all those terms ? In the case of Open Internet standards, what are the criteria for being "directly related" to the mission ? For instance, would the development of a new http protocol considered in scope based on this criteria ? What about the URL specification, or HTML ? This applies to IETF as well as W3C. My preference goes for saying that Open Internet Standards, whether they are from IETF or W3C, or any other compliant Internet SDO (i.e. that follows the operating principles are interoperability, openness, decentralization, and scalability), are consistent as long as they are done in service of the ICANN mission, which is to say that their successes (as standard: pervasive deployment, adoption, interoperability achieved), will directly benefit the ICANN community (e.g. by growing IP and DNS numberp in the future, as they've done in the past). I think that this sort of criteria: will the success of the project benefit ICANN in the end, is better described by "in service of" rather than by "related to", which could end up supporting competing IP or DNS sub-systems (e.g. DOI, which is clearly "related to" ICANN, but certainly not "in service of" it). On 2017-10-18 18:03, Marika Konings wrote:
In relation to agenda item 4, please find attached an updated version of the document which now includes a column labelled ‘draft CCWG conclusion’. This draft conclusion is based on the input that was received by COB yesterday from Daniel, Sylvia, Vanda and Erika. Note that the draft conclusion is based on the input of a relatively small number of CCWG members and participants, but you now have the ability to review the draft conclusion to see if it aligns with your perspectives. Based on the discussions with the leadership team, the idea would be to next share this with the Board and staff liaisons to the CCWG to confirm whether these conclusions align with their perspectives.
Best regards,
Marika
FROM: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> DATE: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 13:56 TO: "ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org> SUBJECT: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda - CCWG Auction Proceeds Meeting on 19 October at 14.00 UTC
Dear All,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the next new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG meeting which has been scheduled for Thursday 19 October at 14.00 UTC. Call details have been distributed separately. If you did not receive the call details and/or require a dial-out, please contact gnso-secs@icann.org.
Best regards,
Marika
PROPOSED AGENDA – NEW GTLD AUCTION PROCEEDS CCWG MEETING – 19 OCTOBER 2017
* Roll Call * Welcome * Review of open and interoperable Internet description (to be distributed shortly) * Review of examples (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zQ66hCxrboAJPKeuU6nHwzHQwmU6g_3kS0JUSSC_tSk/edit[docs.google.com] [1]) * Next steps in relation to charter question 7 ‘(‘Should ICANN oversee the solicitation and evaluation of proposals, or delegate to or coordinate with another entity, including, for example, a foundation created for this purpose?’) * Planning for ICANN60 * Confirm next steps and next meetings (Thursday 02 November 2017 - 8:45– 10:15 Working Group F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C and 13:30 – 15:00 Working Group F2F Meeting in Hall B Section B/C)
_MARIKA KONINGS_
_Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
_Email: marika.konings@icann.org _
_ _
_Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
_Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org] [2] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org] [3]. _
Links: ------ [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1zQ66hCxrboAJPKeuU6nHwzHQwmU6g-5F3kS0JUSSC-5FtSk_edit&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=jjRPM9h4j8u3njNLZQX6Ek5RLjXVeMp141Siul-Qz_c&s=yr1mOja7tIn_AWTAlo_4YQD4R-NhOFFQiGp-g9oaMoI&e= [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=jjRPM9h4j8u3njNLZQX6Ek5RLjXVeMp141Siul-Qz_c&s=hB0JO9rBBt408yQu-X_Eq0-Cxz0tQEbwufpZ7CnpE6w&e= [3] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=jjRPM9h4j8u3njNLZQX6Ek5RLjXVeMp141Siul-Qz_c&s=qU2r3S--aI-xjZsQc39JraXy7QGvGn_DWxZSUtj2l6o&e= _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds