Dear Mr. Wang Wei: Enclosed you will find what C and K agreed on Sep. 30, 2016. There are four sheets of Hanja chars and one summary sheet. Thanks. KIM< K. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:57 AM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear Prof. Kim
In the attached excel, I listed the coordination records in CJK joint meeting Taipei.
Please check if it is the same as your record.
Among the total 261 original unacceptable variant groups (258 + 5F37強 + 5191冑 + 9318錘),
In the round 0, 53+55 go to C rule (in you don’t mind C takes the 53 neutral groups), 50 go to K rule
In the round 1, 25 go to C rule, 13 go to K rule;
in the round 2, 2 go to C, 3 go to K;
which means, 25+13+2+3 = 43 variant groups have been solved.
C and K reached a consensus on above 201 variant groups, leaving 60 groups unsolved.
Let’s work closely to iron out our differences of the rest 60 in the coming IETF meeting.
Regards
WANG Wei
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
-- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok
