Maybe, I am late. I am not sure whether the draft can be regarded as the CGP's statement. Wang Wei proposed the initial draft. It is not clear who supported this document. How to reach the consensus is not clear. From the https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/seeking-input-on-han-script-single-character-idn-generic-top-level-domains-27-06-2024， , it states that the draft is CGP's proposal. I consulted some CGP experts, and they did not know it and did not support it. Jiankang Yao ________________________________ 发件人: ChineseGP <chinesegp-bounces@icann.org> 代表 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via ChineseGP <chinesegp@icann.org> 发送时间: 2023年9月4日 12:25 收件人: 王? <wangwei@cnic.cn>; hotta@jprs.co.jp <hotta@jprs.co.jp>; gimgs0@gmail.com <gimgs0@gmail.com> 抄送: kenny huang, ph.d. <huangk@twnic.net.tw>; Jian Chuan Zhang <jianchuan.zhang@icann.org>; tanyaling@cnic.cn <tanyaling@cnic.cn>; chinesegp@icann.org <chinesegp@icann.org> 主题: Re: [ChineseGP] [Ext] Re: CGP statement on the Single Character TLD implementation Dear Wang Wei, Kenny, Hiro, Thank you for the draft statement and the feedback. I have added a link to the "Proposal for a Chinese Scripts Root Zone LGR" as an information for readers. Dear Prof. Kim 경석김<mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com> May I also follow up your feedback on the document? Posting the link here again for your quick reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLTHRe1ZLieOAbWqdByDBNCKRQd-uUc_cRYWm9fx.... Looking forward to hearing the feedback from you. Thank you. Regards, Pitinan ________________________________ From: hotta@jprs.co.jp <hotta@jprs.co.jp> on behalf of HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 1:55 PM To: 王? Cc: chinesegp@icann.org; gimgs0@gmail.com; Pitinan Kooarmornpatana; Sarmad Hussain; Jian Chuan Zhang; tanyaling@cnic.cn; kenny huang, ph.d. Subject: [Ext] Re: CGP statement on the Single Character TLD implementation Dear Wang Wei, Kenny, Naiwen, and Yaling, Thank you very much for CGP statement draft. The current text of draft statement is in line with the basic thought kept by JGP and Japanese community during Japanese Root Zone LGR (J-LGR) development. I.e., no differentiation between single-character TLDs and multiple-character TLDs was not considered necessary and the current J-LGR is applicable also to single character TLDs. Regards, Hiro On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:29:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00) 王? <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear all
Kenny, Naiwen, Yaling and I drafted the CGP statement in concern with the Chinese single character TLD issue.
I have created a google doc for every one to co-edit or comment, please feel free to input your insights.
link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLTHRe1ZLieO... [docs[.]google[.]com]
Best,
Wei WANG