Dr. Yao, If you and other experts may object the current version of the CGP statement, any specific suggestion to the wording or spelling is welcomed. All GPs are task forces set up by ICANN to address root label generation rules, that CGP ONLY dispose the issues related with repertoire, variants and visual similarities. From that perspective, CGP RZ-LGR for TLD , much like CDNC rule set for SLD, are both applicable to single character label as well as multiple characters label. If you have different opinion, you also have the right to formally suggest CGP’s task should expand to semantic and other registration policy. Or you may suggest why single character label should NOT follow the RZ-LGR. As a team, CGP, should NOT, and has NOT got involved in registration policy discussions on single character issue. As an individual, every CGP member does has right to express his opinion on registration policy at suitable occasions like ccNSO or GAC. Best, Wei WANG -----原始邮件----- 发件人:"Yao Jiankang" <healthyao@hotmail.com> 发送时间:2024-07-11 10:37:18 (星期四) 收件人: "王?" <wangwei@cnic.cn>, "hotta@jprs.co.jp" <hotta@jprs.co.jp>, "gimgs0@gmail.com" <gimgs0@gmail.com>, "Pitinan Kooarmornpatana" <pitinan.koo@icann.org> 抄送: "kenny huang, ph.d." <huangk@twnic.net.tw>, "Jian Chuan Zhang" <jianchuan.zhang@icann.org>, "tanyaling@cnic.cn" <tanyaling@cnic.cn>, "chinesegp@icann.org" <chinesegp@icann.org> 主题: 回复: [Ext] Re: CGP statement on the Single Character TLD implementation Maybe, I am late. I am not sure whether the draft can be regarded as the CGP's statement. Wang Wei proposed the initial draft. It is not clear who supported this document. How to reach the consensus is not clear. From the https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/seeking-input-on-han-script-single-character-idn-generic-top-level-domains-27-06-2024， , it states that the draft is CGP's proposal. I consulted some CGP experts, and they did not know it and did not support it. Jiankang Yao 发件人: ChineseGP <chinesegp-bounces@icann.org> 代表 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana via ChineseGP <chinesegp@icann.org> 发送时间: 2023年9月4日 12:25 收件人: 王? <wangwei@cnic.cn>; hotta@jprs.co.jp <hotta@jprs.co.jp>; gimgs0@gmail.com <gimgs0@gmail.com> 抄送: kenny huang, ph.d. <huangk@twnic.net.tw>; Jian Chuan Zhang <jianchuan.zhang@icann.org>; tanyaling@cnic.cn <tanyaling@cnic.cn>; chinesegp@icann.org <chinesegp@icann.org> 主题: Re: [ChineseGP] [Ext] Re: CGP statement on the Single Character TLD implementation Dear Wang Wei, Kenny, Hiro, Thank you for the draft statement and the feedback. I have added a link to the "Proposal for a Chinese Scripts Root Zone LGR" as an information for readers. Dear Prof. Kim 경석김 May I also follow up your feedback on the document? Posting the link here again for your quick reference: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLTHRe1ZLieOAbWqdByDBNCKRQd-uUc_cRYWm9fx.... Looking forward to hearing the feedback from you. Thank you. Regards, Pitinan From: hotta@jprs.co.jp <hotta@jprs.co.jp> on behalf of HiroHOTTA <hotta@jprs.co.jp> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 1:55 PM To: 王? Cc: chinesegp@icann.org; gimgs0@gmail.com; Pitinan Kooarmornpatana; Sarmad Hussain; Jian Chuan Zhang; tanyaling@cnic.cn; kenny huang, ph.d. Subject: [Ext] Re: CGP statement on the Single Character TLD implementation Dear Wang Wei, Kenny, Naiwen, and Yaling, Thank you very much for CGP statement draft. The current text of draft statement is in line with the basic thought kept by JGP and Japanese community during Japanese Root Zone LGR (J-LGR) development. I.e., no differentiation between single-character TLDs and multiple-character TLDs was not considered necessary and the current J-LGR is applicable also to single character TLDs. Regards, Hiro On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:29:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00) 王? <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote:
Dear all
Kenny, Naiwen, Yaling and I drafted the CGP statement in concern with the Chinese single character TLD issue.
I have created a google doc for every one to co-edit or comment, please feel free to input your insights.
link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sLTHRe1ZLieO... [docs[.]google[.]com]
Best,
Wei WANG