Dear CGP members, Dear Hotta San Prof. Kim of KGP sent out a list of 258 group variants which are not considered as variants in K community. I am asking Prof. Kim to provide more information about their disagreement. I will keep in touch with him and notify everyone the updates from K. Regards Wang Wei 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2015年10月20日 6:43 收件人: 王伟 抄送: 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지; KIM Kyongsok; 신상현; 조성덕 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:03 AM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote: Dear Prof. Kim Dear Mr. WANG: Thanks for the updates is this possible for KGP to give us the information about meaning difference or sound difference of these code points? Like 机（desk）and 機 （machine） Sure. Since I cannot do it myself (^-^), I will ask my colleagues to do it. The number of variant groups is 258 and K characters involved will be more than 500. Therefore, It might take some time. I will let you know when the job is done. Keep in touch. KIM, K. Wang Wei 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2015年10月19日 16:17 收件人: 王伟 抄送: KIM Kyongsok; 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지 主题: Re: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups Dear Mr. WANG: Enclosed you will find four sheets. The last sheet has data now. Hear is a summary of our review: 2015.10.18. Korea's position # variant groups Acceptable 44 Partially Acceptable 1 Unacceptable 258 total 303 Thanks. Rgds, KIM, K. On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:49 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Mr. Wang: Nice to hear from you again.... On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, 王伟 <wangwei@cnic.cn> wrote: Dear Prof. Kim In your document 2.2 141 C variant groups: Not Acceptable - "Since the characters in C variant groups are NOT variants. The characters in C variant groups have different meaning and/or sound." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you mean "The characters in C variant groups are Not variant [in K language environment] " ?? Right. Exactly. ----------------------------------------- 2.3 135 to be reviewed How's the review going? Have you get the final conclusion? Sorry. We made a conclusion. Enclosed you will find four sheets. However the last sheet does not have data yet. I will send a completed sheet tomorrow. Hear is a summary of our review: 2015.10.18. Korea's position # variant groups Acceptable 44 Partially Acceptable 1 Unacceptable 258 total 303 Thanks... KIM, K. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: chinesegp-bounces@icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces@icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok 发送时间: 2015年9月16日 15:02 收件人: chinesegp@icann.org 抄送: JapaneseGP@icann.org; koreanGP@icann.org; KIM Kyongsok 主题: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups Dear CGP members: Enclosed you will find Korea's Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups. Korea will appreciate if CGP would read Korea's review and respond with comments. Thanks in advance. Rgds, KIM, K. ----------------------------- Source: KLGP (Korean Language General Panel) Date: 2015.09.10. Subject: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups Action Requested for CGP: Please review this document and respond with comments -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok -- 김 경석 KIM, Kyongsok