- comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20@icann.org

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Opposed to Additional Pricing Structure of .COMs
by Meredith Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I am a registrant of a .com domain name (many .coms in fact.) I am against the proposed price increase to .COM domains. Verisign is merely your manager of the .COM Registry – it has no business dictating the price. ICANN is supposed to govern the domain name system in the public interest. That means maintaining the domains at an affordable and widely accessible rate. What is the purpose of having ICANN AT LARGE when public interests are not considered in the decision making? The current rate of $7.85 is already far more than justified. Sincerely, M Lucio

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Aliasgar Poonawala Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

We are opposed to the proposed changes. We are a small business and rely heavily on domain names for our business. These proposed changes would leave room for prices to increase quite dramatically and it would make it difficult fit small businesses like us to survive Ali and Sakina Poonawala

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Quit Blood sucking changes now!
by STEPHEN ANOM Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I wish to kick against last month's ICANN significant changes to the contract it has with Verisign, Inc. who operate the .COM top-level-domain (TLD). These changes were subjective and did not consider common interests of .COM websites. It will harm us, stifle our business and constrain our online presence. I am not subscribing to lopsided business wiles. Why should ICANN make .COM domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody? It's far from imagination.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] NO on .com domain name price increases
by jdbjac Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

There is good NO reason to allow .com domain name registration price increases. This will hurt small business owners, like myself, more than anyone, and I don't need more unnecessary price increases.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed ICANN - Verisign Contract Changes
by Mark Torpey Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As an Internet user and .COM domain holder, please be advised that I am extremely concerned about proposed ICANN changes to your contract with Verisign and how you can spend the .COM fees. These funds should specifically be allocated to domain infrastructure - Make it better, not more expensive. We do need to limit and better yet prevent these fee increases. The Internet is for the public "domain" providing a platform that prevent .COMs from becoming less available and more expensive for everybody. Access should not be a "free for all" money making proposition. Please do keep the Internet accessible to everyone. Mark Torpey 4740 E. Le Marche Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85032 602-992-6161 <mailto:marktorpey@q.com> marktorpey(a)q.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment on Proposed Amendment 3
by Drew Short Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As an entrepreneur and avid user of the internet I protest the deal brokered behind closed doors to increase the prices of .COM over the next decade. The barrier to entry is high enough, don’t make deals to allow for the inflation of prices on the core TLD. Increasing prices will just solidify power in those who currently rent domains and will reduce the innovation from young individuals with limited budgets. .IO pricing is already out of control, don’t let .COM be the next mistake. ——————————— Drew Short Software Engineer e: drew(a)sothr.com p: +1 (651) 285-4565 ———————————

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increase
by Kim Buerman Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am writing to inform you that I am not in favor of the new proposed price increase of the .com domains. This increase will hurt millions of small businesses. This price increase would only benefit big corporations and those who can afford to purchase them for corrupt purposes, which will lead to additional problems and the safety of the public internet.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Chase Baer Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I feel this proposed fee hike for .com domain price increases violates the public interest and serves only Verisign. I can see why Verisign is concerned for profit margins considering they had overcharged for YEARS with inflated certificate signing and stifled public protections for privacy and security innovations. Conservatively I personally may have as little as 15-20 domains at any given time. Many friends and associates have many more. 30 to 50% of those domains are .com. Only through dedicated application, focus, testing and research can worthy domains be cultivated and monetized. A lot of time and energy goes into making a domain and business idea profitable. It is a chaotic process and there are no crystal balls. There are a lot of prevalent practices that we struggle with. But to hike domain fees only serves to kill innovation and prevent digital entrepreneurs like myself and others like my associates from successfully participating. All those costs add up real quick and provide a very real barrier to entry. We are only beginning to enter the era of the global digital entrepreneur. We need to be making it easier not harder. If Verisign can't find ways to value-add rather than take advantage of people - they deserve to file Chapter 11. STOP gouging consumers and the people who are working hard every day to make innovation happen!

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .com price increases
by Bill Tackett Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Many small companies, small organizations and individuals own .com domains, not just large corporations. Allowing pretty much unfettered price increases for .com domains is going to negatively impact these groups, especially individuals. Needing to increase the cost to support additional and/or updated infrastructure required to manage the.com TLD seems reasonable but giving a for profit third party company the ability to raise the price for 8 years of a 10 year period is ridiculous. Please reconsider the structure of this agreement and limit the aggregate cost increases to something concrete and fair like no more than a 100% price increase spread incrementally over the course of a 10 year period. Thanks for your consideration. Bill Tackett

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] New ICANN fees
by Orange Juice Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

It is regrettable to hear that an organization so large is willing to risk losing it's broad range of customers because it did not explain how price increases would be carefully monitored and wisely spent. I would like to point out that world-wide organizations reliant on technology, which thought that they were too important to ever lose their customers did indeed die in an instant. Landline phones, vinyl records, cassette tapes, Pan Am, DeLorean: They all thought the world's eyes and investment would stay with them but they ended up with zero customers. I myself have moved away from .COM domains, as of today I only own two out of my previous dozens. Why, have I moved away from .COM: Your future customer's customers aren't interested in ancient technology. And typing in ".com" is ancient.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase prices for .COM domains!!
by Joseph J. Lam Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN, Please keep prices where they are for these domains to make it as accessible as possible for the rest of the world. Domains are what allow individuals to create their passion projects, have a presence online, and shape their future. Keeping prices low understandably will not be in favor of your bottom line, but is that what you're waking up every day for? The cause you're standing for, that inspires you to get out of bed every morning, is ultimately to give the people the ability to work on their dreams and create a better world for us all. Thank you for considering. With gratitude, Joe *--* *Joseph J. Lam* joejlam.com | @joejlam <https://twitter.com/joejlam> 415-828-7357 | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/joejlam/>

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] (no subject)
by Danny Crum Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I would like to express my concern about the proposed price increase of .com domains. As a small business owner even the smallest price increases add up. I would appreciate your consideration in keeping prices where they are. Thank you Danny Crum Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Don't Increase Domain Costs
by Michael Savage Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

To Whom It May Concern, Please do not increase domain costs and allow Verisign to increase costs. As a small business it difficult keeping costs down and this would be a detriment to our business. Domain registration alone should not cost an arm and leg. Michael Savage Operations Manager / Paralegal *BAUGHER LAW FIRM** PLLC* 6912 220th Street SW, Suite 214 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Office: (425) 275-5000 ext. 104 Direct/Cell: (425) 329-3529 Fax: (888) 867-1922 *This email and attachments (if any) may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Thank you.*

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Price increase
by ridgemoorrealty Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I'm opposed to your effort to increase.com prices significantly! Please hold the line and keep prices fair. Steven Snyder Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S9.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] ICANN .com price agreement
by B Talbot Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I am a domain owner and I oppose the increase in .com price. If ICANN is going to relinquish it's role in pricing oversite, the management of .com should be bid out and not assigned to a single entity with no competitive pricing. In addition, the $20m kickback to fund undisclosed ICANN programs establish a poor practice of "pay to play" when dealing with ICANN. ICANN should be working in a transparent manner in the public interest and not looking to fund itself while allowing a private company to monopolize the registration process and prices.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I'm opposed
by Marinko Garasevic Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

I’m to opposed to any price increase! If it passes I will let all domains expire. -Marinko

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Comment for amendment
by Chris Voelz Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Please do not monopolize the .com system. I am voicing my opinion that you should reconsider the current plan you have with verisign and consider the impacts it has on businesses. Work with current registrars to determine a plan moving forward and don’t let the greed of money blind you. Thank you. Chris

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM Price increase
by Mark Henry Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

As more and more people use .com, your costs should be going down. I would appreciate it if you would extend that discount to your customers. You are not going to end up making more money, companies will start switching to other domains, and as it becomes more and more websites start using non-.com registries, people will become accustomed to not going to .com sites and that will snowball in to the use of many registries. Registries will become almost as varied as websites. Best, Mark Henry Natural Citrus Ingredients 972-658-2157 1602 Mapleleaf Fall Dr. Allen, TX 75002 mark(a)naturalcitrusingredients.com

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] I disagree
by Shlomi Vaknin Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Your recent heist of .COM domains prices is unacceptable, and you’re going to ruin your organization’s reputation by doing so.

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increase amendment
by John Kitchen Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Hello, I am very disappointed to learn today that ICANN has made a secret deal with Verisign, to benefit both parties financially, to the detriment of internet users and in particular small businesses, worldwide. Small businesses rely on being able to utilize the .com TLD as a trusted way for their customers to reach them online. ICANN's self-serving deal with Verisign means that retaining .com domains, will be approximately 70% more cost prohibitive over the next 10 years. This deal makes .com domains less accessible and more expensive for everybody. It is a bad deal for everyone except ICANN and Verisign. This secret deal is contrary to ICANN's remit, which in part is to maintain, not reduce competition in the domain marketplace. Please consider scrapping these planned changes. Kind regards, John Kitchen

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Please do not increase costs for .COM domains
by Matt S Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Many hobbyists and small businesses will look elsewhere for domain names if costs increase for .COM. Please reconsider the rate hike. Matt Staroscik

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Comunica Tres Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Alejandro Durán Comunica Tres (442) 2 42 22 17

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] raising of .com prices
by Evernote Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] No back room negotiations between Verisihn and ICANN for TLDs - Proposed Amendment 3 to the .COM Registry Agreement
by Mauricio Bendeck Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Dear ICANN We oppose to your position to negotiate only with Verisign to control the TLDs and is much vehemently oppose behind the doors negotiations with Verisign without public comment. Thank you Mauricio Bendeck +1-305-484-1355

1 0

[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Stop being greedy
by Moazam Nabi Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

Let people live. Not everyone is making money from online business these days. So, please stop this!

1 0