April 2019 - comments-org-renewal-18mar19@icann.org

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Don't lift price caps for .org domains
by Stephen Sequeira April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

To whom it may concern, Please do not lift price caps for .org domains. The vast majority of .org domain holders are nonprofit or no-profit organizations who cannot afford the fees that PIR could potentially charge if the cap were lifted. Lifting price caps would be a horrible decision that would negatively affect thousands of individuals and organizations who make a positive contribution to society. Please rethink your proposal. Thank you, Stephen Sequeira

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] With section 2.10 of the .org renewal agreement
by Stefan Tamburro April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I strongly disagree with the removal of price caps on .org domain. I am a user who deals with many domains for clients, and the removal of caps will make the renewal of these .org domains become outlandish in price. Thanks, Stefan Tamburro ----------------------------- design made. simple. www.designmadesimple.net<https://www.designmadesimple.net/> 502-821-6852 (mobile)

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] opposition to removal of price caps on .org TLD
by Ramnarine, Eon April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I write to oppose the removal of price caps on any of the "legacy" TLDs as doing so will only create a free-for-all on limitless price increases across the well-established board. The new GTLDs are already accepted as alternative options with price expectations that vary greatly based on the registry; however, current registrants of older well established extensions are expected to maintain some level of stability. These legacy domain names, some of which have been registered for many years, are unlike the new mess being created and owners of these legacy names have a reasonable expectation of affordability and stability. The old manta goes 'if it is not broken, you do not try and fix it.' The vast majority of domain owners will remain unaffected so long as the fluctuating and exorbitant prices remain in the newer name space; there will be plenty of years ahead for ICANN to benefit from those while allowing stability within the legacy name space. Leave well enough alone and move forward without effecting millions and millions of current and well established registrants who expect their domain expenses to remain reasonable, affordable and stable. Eon Ramnarine Senior Systems Administrator MICROSOFT COLLABORATION APPLICATIONS TEAM T 630.724.6026 E eramnarine(a)ftdi.com<mailto:eramnarine@ftdi.com> [cid:image001.png@01D4FB3F.400221E0] ----------------- FTD Companies, Inc. This message is solely for the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] No to hike in fees
by Rotimi Kehinde April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

As a design agency who works primarily with Non-profit organizations, I stand by the current fees for .org domains. Increasing prices makes no sense. These are charitable organizations who mostly use this domain.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comment on .org Registry Agreement
by Max Mogensen April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Hello, I provide domain registration for multiple business and non-profits clients in the US. I would kindly request that you maintain the current system regarding PIR, namely that increases in registration prices are only increased by a maximum of 10% each year. Thank you, Max Mogensen, Owner of Maine Creative, Ltd. Co., Portland, Maine

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org price cap
by Warren Petersen April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Good day, As a non-profit organization, we maintain a tightly controlled budget with third-party audit oversight. Needless to say, Oak Grove School would be negatively affected by substantial price increases on our domains if price caps are removed on .ORG registrations. I ask that price caps remain in place. Respectfully, Warren Petersen Director of Outreach <https://oakgroveschool.org/> warrenpetersen(a)oakgroveschool.org <mailto:warrenpetersen@oakgroveschool.org> +1-805-648-3182 <tel:+1-805-648-3182> oakgroveschool.org <https://oakgroveschool.org/> 220 W. Lomita Ave | Ojai CA 93023 <https://maps.google.com/?q=220+W.+Lomita+Ave+%7C+Ojai+CA+93023> <https://www.instagram.com/oakgroveschool/> <https://www.facebook.com/OakGroveSchoolOjai> <https://www.youtube.com/user/OakGroveSchoolOjai> <https://twitter.com/OakGroveOjai>

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Do not increase pricing for .org
by Lindahl, Melanie April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Hi - all of the .org sites I create are for very small non-profit groups who simply cannot afford for web costs to increase. Please do not adjust the pricing structure that would allow domain costs to increase dramatically. I typically consider a 1-3% increase every renewal period, but any more than that is not sustainable by these small companies who are trying to do good in their communities. Let's all be kind and not greedy. Best, Melanie Lindahl Melanie Lindahl | Web Designer The University of Texas School of Law (512) 232-1186

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comments objecting to the .org renewal
by Stacy T. Lindsey April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

Dear ICANN, I am a .org registrant and a not-for-profit or non-profit organization. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Regards, Stacy T. Lindsey

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] I oppose the proposed increase in 'legacy' tld domains
by Eon Ramnarine April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

I write to oppose the removal of price caps on any of the “legacy” TLDs as doing so will only create a free-for-all on limitless price increases across the well-established board. The new GTLDs are already accepted as alternative options with price expectations that vary greatly based on the registry; however, current registrants of older well established extensions are expected to maintain some level of stability. These legacy domain names, some of which have been registered for many years, are unlike the new mess being created and owners of these legacy names have a reasonable expectation of affordability and stability. The old manta goes ‘if it is not broken, you do not try and fix it.’ The vast majority of domain owners will remain unaffected so long as the fluctuating and exorbitant prices remain in the newer name space; there will be plenty of years ahead for ICANN to benefit from those while allowing stability within the legacy name space. Leave well enough alone and move forward without effecting millions and millions of current and well established registrants who expect their domain expenses to remain reasonable, affordable and stable.

1 0

[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] Comments objecting to the .org renewal
by Ryan Gibson April 25, 2019

April 25, 2019

To whom it may concern: I am a domain name registrant. ICANN does not seem to recognize the difference between a legacy extension created with the support of the US government, that predates the existence of ICANN and that has millions of existing users and the brand new extensions that started off with a new set of rules, in particular no price controls, and no existing registrants. They have completely different characteristics, history, and ownership structure. It is not acceptable for ICANN to ignore these differences and to propose that they be treated the same. Removing price caps is not fair to .org domain owners. Many of them have websites that they have used for years. If price caps are removed, the cost to renew their domain names may become too expensive, and they could be forced to give up websites that are important to them. The Uniform Rapid Suspension policy is too new and untested to apply on domain names that may be 20 years old or more. With the URS, the domain names could be taken down in a matter of days with little notice. ICANN should be doing more to protect owners of .org domain names. Why is ICANN trying to remove price protections for .org domain owners, so many of which are non-profits, so that they can be overcharged for their domain names? Ryan Gibson

1 0