Thanks very much Julf! Wolf-Ulrich Am 27.06.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Johan Helsingius:
Wolf-Ulrich,
Good point - based on this, I suggest amending that sentence in Resolved 1d to:
"Following this determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the GNSO Council _as part of the agenda_."
Julf
On 23/06/17 10:06, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben wrote:
Thanks Julf,
but maybe I misunderstood. I mean the reference in the motion to the consent agenda of the future meetings where the council is supposed to sanction the leadership's proposal (see Resolved 1d: ...Following this determination, this decision is to be confirmed by the GNSO Council _as part of the consent agenda_...).
What is the SSC's rationale for this?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Am 20.06.2017 um 16:32 schrieb Johan Helsingius:
Wolf-Ulrich,
I've only one question: what is the SSC's rationale (under Res. 1d) to put this decision on the councils _consent_ agenda? No rationale, purely an off-by-one error on my part. It is supposed to be Item 4 on the agenda. My apologies!
Julf
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council