I suspect a LOT of emails sent and received by many of us have those standard disclaimer footers. They’re default. And context should be our guide Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Brian Aitchison <brian.aitchison@icann.org> Date: Monday 22 April 2019 at 22:56 To: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, "GNSO Council List (council@gnso.icann.org)" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] [Ext] Re: Revised Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy: Policy Status Report (IRTP PSR) Hello Maxim, The confidentiality disclaimer does not apply in this case as you, the Council, and Community are the “intended recipients” and the information is not confidential. Please do share and discuss! Best, Brian From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Monday, April 22, 2019 at 2:50 PM To: Brian Aitchison <brian.aitchison@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, "GNSO Council List (council@gnso.icann.org)" <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [council] Revised Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy: Policy Status Report (IRTP PSR) Dear Brian, Could we have some clarity on the reason for the confidentiality disclaimer to be used on the public list, and how the Councilors are supposed to discuss the matters in their respective constituencies without being able to share the information? Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On 22 Apr 2019, at 22:15, Brian Aitchison <brian.aitchison@icann.org<mailto:brian.aitchison@icann.org>> wrote: Dear GNSO Council, Please find attached the Revised Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy: Policy Status Report. This version includes feedback received from public comments and associated survey, updated information from the EPDP on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data, and presents possible options for next steps. ICANN org requests that the Council review the revised report and provide guidance on how to proceed. We thank the Council and its members in advance for reviewing the revised report, and look forward to your feedback. All best, Brian -- Brian Aitchison, PhD Lead Researcher Operations and Policy Research Global Domains Division (GDD) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Los Angeles, CA p. 424 353 9041 e. brian.aitchison@icann.org<mailto:brian.aitchison@icann.org> Sk. brian.aitchison.icann CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this communication by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council