Yes, and the 'summit' naming has generated some heat on some other fora, so it isn't a matter of naming only - summit implies a high level intergovernmental event to some. Regards David On 16 Nov 2013, at 6:01 pm, Magaly Pazello <magaly.pazello@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi John! Brazilian gov is not calling "summit" the meeting next year the oficial name is Multstakholder Conference on the Future of Internet Governance. Magaly
On Saturday, November 16, 2013, John Berard <john@crediblecontext.com> wrote:
What do governments and I-stars mean by "accelerating the globalization of ICANN and IANA"?
What’s the test to avoid "scope creep" into issues outside of ICANN’s mandate?
What’s the process ICANN could use to involve bottom-up work on answering the challenge of Montevideo, Brasil Summit, and ITU?
Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
Please respond to this thread with any question/s you propose to raise tomorrow