Thanks Dan. From: Reed, Daniel A [mailto:dan-reed@uiowa.edu] Sent: 12 June 2014 18:26 To: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board Transparency on decision processes is what I hear most often with respect to the ICANN board (relates to bypassing processes). From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:37 AM To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board All, Please can you provide input as to the topics your SG and/or Constituency would like to see the Council (bearing in mind the role and function of the Council) raise and discuss with the ICANN board in our meeting in London. A couple of ideas: - An update on key themes of the work of the Council and associated policy work in the GNSO (Keeping this very short) o GNSO / GAC CG o PDP improvements o Other? - Effective and appropriate management of policy work in the ICANN structures. A point related to concerns over bypassing policy processes. Has this improved, got worse or stayed the same? - A N Other Jonathan