Apologies…, this was actually two years ago, not last year. Thanks. Amr
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:
Hi James,
I don’t think this is exactly what you’re looking for, but last year, ICANN’s Development and Public Responsibility Department conducted a survey among Fellowship Program alumni, which I thought had some interesting findings, particularly on why Fellows may find it difficult to keep up in participation: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/fellowship-alumni-survey-results....
I hope you find it helpful.
Thanks.
Amr
On Nov 29, 2016, at 9:18 PM, James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com> wrote:
Absolutely.
Altho I’d love to see some data that correlates attendance at an ICANN meeting with an uptick in new volunteer participation. We’ve often heard the CEO or Chair announce (in London, and most recently Hyderabad) that the current ICANN meeting is the “largest in its history.” But I haven’t yet seen where overall attendance translates in to a deeper pool of volunteers for policy work.
Thanks –
J.
On 11/29/16, 12:43 , "owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of Amr Elsadr" <owner-council@gnso.icann.org on behalf of aelsadr@egyptig.org> wrote:
Hi,
And if holding meeting B in Africa and LAC encourages stakeholders from those regions to engage with the GNSO’s PDP, then all the better.
Thanks.
Amr
On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:32 PM, Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin@neustar.biz> wrote:
Hi Carlos
While your suggestion makes perfect sense the reality is that the smaller meeting B, ie Policy Meetings, were designed to enable ICANN to host meetings in locations predominately in the African and LAC regions that can no longer host the larger ICANN meetings.
Prior to the establishment of the Meeting Strategy Working Group (MSWG), Nick Tomasso published a proposal suggesting that hub locations be used, although Nick called them Consolidated Meeting Locations, and adjusted the rotation through regions. Nick's proposal was rejected and the MSWG was established.
Nick's proposal is available at: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/meetings-proposal-02oct12-en.pdf
The MSWG also discussed the idea of hubs as well but agreed to continue regional rotation.
Donna
-----Original Message----- From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:16 PM To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com> Cc: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com>; Edward Morris <egmorris1@toast.net>; GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Preliminary planning for ICANN58
Thank you James. But here we are working on the 2nd derivative: ICANN hubs for Policy (short) Meetings. Don´t know if this was also discarded.
Cheers
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 28 Nov 2016, at 20:34, James M. Bladel wrote:
Just a note that the Meeting Strategy Working Group examined the idea of “rotating hubs”, and rejected them. Mostly by folks from smaller and/or more distant locations who were concerned that ICANN would be permanently absent from their region.
I don’t agree, but that was their finding.
Thanks –
J.
On 11/28/16, 11:59 , "Michele Neylon - Blacknight" <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Carlos
Ah ok, so the ICANN hubs. That makes a lot of sense from a cost and logistics perspective.
Regards
Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.host_&d=D... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blacknight.blog_&d=DgIDa... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.press&d=D... - get our latest news & media coverage https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.technology.ie&d=DgID... Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mneylon.social&d=DgIDaQ&... Random Stuff: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__michele.irish&d=DgIDaQ&c... ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
On 28/11/2016, 11:33, "Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G." <crg@isoc-cr.org> wrote:
ICANN hubs: LA, Istambul and Singapore.
I assume that those places are central located in terms of airlines logistics, already have a minimum of ICANN staff available, facilites, etc. and would greatly reduce the cost to set up meetings (A recent meeting of the CCT-RT in Washington DC had to fly in as many ICANN staff members as RT members, which calls for more reasonable places to meet, particularly for mainle “working” meetings like the Policy Format calls for).
Cheers
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 26 Nov 2016, at 10:14, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Carlos
Which locations would you see as being “hubs”?
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.blacknight.host_&d=D... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__blacknight.blog_&d=DgIDa... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ceo.hosting_&d=DgIDaQ&c=... Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265, Ireland Company No.: 370845