Dear Council colleagues Following my indication that the IPC would favour the GNSO supporting the ALAC Petition, Greg suggested that I put forward a Motion to that effect which would have to be considered as a late Motion under the procedure in our Operating Procedures at sections 3.3.2 a, b and c (extract copied below). Having subsequently seen the indication from Sam that the RySG also does not support the Petition, and discussed further with my Constituency, our conclusion is that such a Motion would have no prospect of passing at this time and Council's time would be better spent on agreeing the path forward for reviews. The IPC would however like to put forward a proposed Motion for possible late consideration on Thursday, relating to the next steps on Reviews. We believe that it will send a much stronger message to the Board if the GNSO Council votes on a position, rather than simply sending a letter. Of the four options summarised by Greg for our consideration and discussion on Thursday, the IPC supports option 1, as expressed by Tomslin as follows: * The community to urgently propose a Bylaws amendment to the board that would amend the Bylaws to allow for a one-time review of all Reviews currently required by the Bylaws (with solutions for the issues we face today with reviews as output recommendations) and to suspend the conduct of all Reviews until this exercise is completed; * With the explicit safeguard of time frame and that if this is not done within a specified period, the current Reviews obligations come back fully into force. As we understand it, this was the proposal discussed in Prague during the SOAC Leaders' meeting, which seemed to gain support. With that in mind, our proposed Motion envisages that the Council might vote to support option 1 and proposes that we convene a small team to develop a draft Bylaws amendment and a possible plan for the actual review of reviews. We appreciate that this is being proposed on very short notice - and we also appreciate that there is time on the Council agenda to discuss next steps on reviews. We would ask, therefore, that the Request for Consideration on Late Notice, required as a precursor, and, if supported, the subsequent consideration of the Motion is scheduled on our agenda to happen after the discussion item. This would allow Council the opportunity to vote, if we do reach agreement on this as a path forward. Of course, if a different path is agreed or any Councillors are not in a position to vote, it would be open to me to withdraw the Motion or for the Request for Consideration to be rejected (since it requires unanimity). The Motion could then be re-presented (amended as necessary) for either our August meeting or even, potentially, for a special meeting before then. The proposed Motion is being presented, therefore, to get something on the table for others to consider and see whether you might support it. The Request for Consideration on Late Notice, and the Draft Motion are attached, and also here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tHkxgi_2mvWWD8CNqe91kPSj132Y_q3HGRW--PkJ... Many thanks for your consideration. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy [cid:image001.png@01DBF022.95C806B0]<https://comlaude.com/> 28 Little Russell Street, London WC1A 2HN, UK T +44 (0) 20 7421 8250 Ext 255 comlaude.com<http://comlaude.com> Follow us on LinkedIn<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/pRkAAFJfAADw_RQA0> and YouTube<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/bhkAAFJfAADw_RQA0> [cid:image002.png@01DBF022.95C806B0]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/com-laude> [cid:image003.png@01DBF022.95C806B0] <https://twitter.com/comlaude?lang=en> [cid:image004.png@01DBF022.95C806B0] <https://www.facebook.com/ComLaude/> [cid:image005.png@01DBF022.95C806B0] <https://www.youtube.com/@comlaude> [cid:image006.jpg@01DBF022.95C806B0] ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that Com Laude Group Limited (the "Com Laude Group") does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group is a limited company registered in England and Wales with company number 10689074 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6181291 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176 and registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, a corporation incorporated in the State of Washington and principal office address at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan with company number 0100-01-190853 and registered office at 1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan; Com Laude Domain ESP S.L.U., a company registered in Spain and registered office address at Calle Barcas 2, 2, Valencia, 46002, Spain. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com>
