Thank you, Greg. That letter reached the BC this morning and I had a read. It is very much in alignment with everything we have discussed and what is being recommended by the Small Team. I will incentivize the members to move ahead in drafting our letter so that we continue to add legitimacy and transparency to the process, leaving behind a solid trail of documents that validates this to the broader Internet community and something all stakeholders are getting behind. Best, On 8 Nov 2022 19:53, DiBiase, Gregory via council wrote:
Dear GNSO Councillors,
As you may recall, a recommendation in the DNS Abuse small team report was to consult with contracted parties re: potential issues with the existing accreditation agreements with ICANN. It seems Contracted Parties may be ahead of the curve and have sent a CPH letter to ICANN org re: DNS Abuse provisions in their contracts (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/heineman-demetriou-to-m...) . I am flagging it here for everyone’s reference.
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Mark W. Datysgeld [markwd.website <https://markwd.website>] Director at Governance Primer [governanceprimer.com <https://governanceprimer.com>] ICANN GNSO Councilor