Mike, First of all, it seems to me that the following 'whereas' clause is a resolution and covered in that part of the motion, so I think it could be deleted: "Whereas, notwithstanding the recommendations in the Issues Report, the GNSO Council has decided to initiate a PDP on vertical integration between registries and registrars; and" Debbie - As the seconder of the motion, do you consider it a friendly amendment? Do any Councilors need more time to vet this amendment with their SGs and/or Constituencies? Chuck ________________________________ From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:32 AM To: GNSO Council Subject: FW: FW: [council] FW: Draft Motions on Vertical Integration All, Attached please find a somewhat redrafted motion in support of a PDP, which I accept in its entirety as a friendly amendment to my pending motion. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/>