Agree we should discuss some clarifications/improvements and address any missing steps. I notice there's no mention of how the Board receives and considers input from other SO/ACs about GAC's advice, which has been a problem for the GNSO in the past. Darcy On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 09-03-18 17:45, Austin, Donna via council wrote:
It's unclear to me who owns or who drafted this document. Is it the Board, the GAC, ICANN?
My apologies for not responding sooner, but I was travelling to ICANN61, and while there had been some scaremongering about power outages in Puerto Rico, I wasn't prepared to find out, as I landed in Atlanta on my way, that a large part of Amsterdam had been without power for more than 8 hours (taking down, among other things, my mail server).
As has become clear, it is an informal staff document. I agree with the view expressed by several people here that we should take some effort to get it improved just in case it gets used as a shorthand for the proper procedure.
Julf
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council