Another amendment proposed to be added to the list of Resolutions: Resolved, the GNSO Council instructs ICANN Policy Staff to add the remaining RAP Recommendations to the GNSO Project List so that the GNSO Council can keep track of the remaining recommendations and address these as appropriate. This is language from one of the initial drafts put together by staff and I think it helps allaying any concerns that the rest of RAP recommendations are not being dealt with by the Council. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Zahid Jamil Sent: 03 February 2011 09:55 To: 'Neuman, Jeff'; 'GNSO Council' Subject: RE: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion Dear Jeff, Happy to treat as friendly. Also may I suggest that in order to ensure that there is no confusion as a result of the Resolutions that the Council may possibly be disregarding the OTHER RAP WG/RAP IDT recommendations, an appropriate WHERAS be added that in gist says that the Council acknowledges the extensive work of the RAP WG/RAP IDT and their recommendations and the following Resolutions do not mean that the Council has disregarded the other recommendations which will be addressed in due course by the Council. We need to move on these issues as Council and at the same time ensure fulfilling our role as Policy Managers respecting the bottom up policy making process. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited. From: owner-council@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff Sent: 03 February 2011 07:14 To: Neuman, Jeff; 'GNSO Council' Subject: [council] CORRECTION: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion All, It is my understanding that despite the original author of a motion wanting the withdraw, the motion may indeed still be on the table if 2 Councilors support the motion staying on the table. I cannot say whether that will happen, but in the event it does (or if it comes up later), I have to correct the Friendly Amendment proposed by the Registries. It should read: . Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for use by TLD operators who adopt them. So the full amendment would read: RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Final Report. This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects: . Practices for identifying stolen credentials . Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of malicious use (such as malware and phishing) . Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements by registrars who adopt them, and for use by TLD operators who adopt them. . Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by abusers . Practices for suspending domain names . Account access security management . Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries . Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used, and their adoption rates. I hope this is still treated as friendly. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy _____ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: Neuman, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:14 PM To: 'GNSO Council' Subject: Proposed Friendly Amendment to Zahid's Amendment to RAP motion All, The RySG is proposing a friendly amendment to Zahid's proposed amendment to the RAP Motion. We understand Zahid's motion is not considered friendly by Tim, so there will be a vote on Zahid's proposal. As discussed on an RySG call this morning, the RySG will support Zahid's proposed amendment if his motion is amended by adding the word "possible" in the sentence: . Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators. So the full amendment would read: RESOLVED #3, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries address the illicit use of domain names in accordance with Registration Abuse Policies Working Group Final Report. This effort should consider (but not be limited the following subjects: . Practices for identifying stolen credentials . Practices for identifying and investigating common forms of malicious use (such as malware and phishing) . Creating anti-abuse terms of service for possible inclusion in Registrar-Registrant agreements, and for use by TLD operators. . Identifying compromised/hacked domains versus domain registered by abusers . Practices for suspending domain names . Account access security management . Security resources of use or interest to registrars and registries . Survey registrars and registries to determine practices being used, and their adoption rates. The rationale is that the premise of the work is for the creation of non-binding best practices and adding this word is in line with that notion. We hope this will be considered friendly. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166 Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / <mailto:jeff.neuman@neustar.biz> jeff.neuman@neustar.biz / <http://www.neustar.biz/> www.neustar.biz _____ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.