Has the option arisen to reapportion time from the reply period to the original comment period? I'm not aware of much use for reply comments, so it seems silly to give that period the same duration, unless we just de facto make it an opportunity to submit new issues. I'm not speaking from an NCSG position of concern, just curiosity. --Wendy "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@indom.com> wrote:
Councillors,
FYI, please see below an excerpt of a conversation that was had during this week's ICANN Chairs call.
I am not aware of any specific problems at Council level, but would like to know if individual groups are having difficulties so that I can carry that message back if that's the case.
Thanks,
Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM Group NBT France ---------------- Head of Domain Operations Group NBT
Début du message réexpédié :
De : Lesley Cowley <lesley@nominet.org.uk> Objet : Rép : [soac-chairs] Reminder: SO/AC Chair Telephone Conference Date : 28 mai 2012 17:37:49 HAEC À : "soac-chairs@icann.org" <soac-chairs@icann.org>
Hi,
I wanted to discuss the difficulty the ccNSO is having with the revised comment period timelines - the current 21 day minimum comment period (followed by the reply comment period) means that we do not have sufficient time to formulate formal ccNSO comments to consultations.
Olivier advised that the ALAC share this concern and have already raised it with ICANN staff, but as an AC they are able to comment outside of the comment period.
I was wondering if other SO/AC Chairs are also having difficulties.
Kind regards,
Lesley
Lesley Cowley, OBE CEO Nominet Minerva House Edmund Halley Road Oxford Science Park Oxford, OX4 4DQ UK
Tel: +44-(0)-1865-332211 http://www.nominet.org.uk/
-- wendy@seltzer.com mobile +1.914.374.0613