Motion for the initiation of the GNSO Guidance on Applicant Support
Dear Councilors, Please find attached the revised motion and associated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support for our Council call on August 25th. The changes to the motion itself are marginal. The sources of those made to the GGP initiation request attached to the motion are twofold: * The discussion held at our last call, notably on the size, the flexibility and representative nature of the group * The proposal from Kurt, which we reviewed during and after the call (thanks Kurt) on the metrics, and skill set both within the group and for SMEs A final note to draw your attention on section 6. Decision-making methodology for GGP, which has not changed and as it stands is based on the Working Group Guidelines and GNSO consensus playbook. Views are welcome as to whether for this GGP, other methodology with possibly less emphasis on recording the various degrees of group agreement should be considered. Thank you. Regards, Philippe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hello, The motion will be posted on the motion 25 August 2022 wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/CIRJD>. Kindest regards, Terri From: council <council-bounces@gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "philippe.fouquart--- via council" <council@gnso.icann.org> Reply-To: "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Friday, August 12, 2022 at 5:50 AM To: "council@gnso icann. org" <council@gnso.icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [council] Motion for the initiation of the GNSO Guidance on Applicant Support Dear Councilors, Please find attached the revised motion and associated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support for our Council call on August 25th. The changes to the motion itself are marginal. The sources of those made to the GGP initiation request attached to the motion are twofold: * The discussion held at our last call, notably on the size, the flexibility and representative nature of the group * The proposal from Kurt, which we reviewed during and after the call (thanks Kurt) on the metrics, and skill set both within the group and for SMEs A final note to draw your attention on section 6. Decision-making methodology for GGP, which has not changed and as it stands is based on the Working Group Guidelines and GNSO consensus playbook. Views are welcome as to whether for this GGP, other methodology with possibly less emphasis on recording the various degrees of group agreement should be considered. Thank you. Regards, Philippe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Thank you, Philippe, for circulating the updated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support, and thank you also to those who worked on the same. With reference to the red-line copy, if I may suggest 4 minor amendments for consideration: 1. Pg 4, Task 4, 5th line, to delete the word "they". 2. Pg 5, the red text paragraph immediately after Task 6, to provide clarity and distinguish reference to the Working Group (from the SubPro Working Group) by adding "(constituted herein)" after the first instance of "the Working Group" in the sentence (or something to that effect). 3. Pg 7, to move the entire 3rd paragraph which reads, with red line amendments,
"Members are expected to participate during the course of deliberations. Members are expected to represent the view of their appointing organization and may be called on to provide the official position of their appointing organization. Members will be responsible for participating in GGP consensus calls. Appointing organizations may replace their Member(s) at their discretion, but shall be responsible for ensuring that their Member(s) are appropriately prepared to contribute to the GGP without causing undue delays to the GGP’s deliberations."
up to top of pg 7, immediately after the sentence in the 1st paragraph, which reads, "Members shall be appointed by their organizations according to their own internal procedures." This is because, as I understand it, the intent behind the entire 3rd paragraph (as quoted) would apply to entire life of the Working Group in the event Council resolves to add more topics, and not just for Applicant Support. 4. Also on pg 7, assuming that the red line paragraph that reads,
"Once the Working Group has been formed and before the first meeting is held, Council leadership will provide the Working Group with a draft set of “success criteria” for the Working Group, which the Working Group will refine."
is intended to address an overarching "success criteria" which is in turn not intended to apply solely to the topic of Applicant Support, then I would suggest swapping the position of this paragraph with the one that precedes it immediately. Thank you in advance for considering the above. Kind regards, Justine On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 18:50, philippe.fouquart--- via council < council@gnso.icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
Please find attached the revised motion and associated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support for our Council call on August 25th.
The changes to the motion itself are marginal. The sources of those made to the GGP initiation request attached to the motion are twofold:
- The discussion held at our last call, notably on the size, the flexibility and representative nature of the group - The proposal from Kurt, which we reviewed during and after the call (thanks Kurt) on the metrics, and skill set both within the group and for SMEs
A final note to draw your attention on section 6. Decision-making methodology for GGP, which has not changed and as it stands is based on the Working Group Guidelines and GNSO consensus playbook. Views are welcome as to whether for this GGP, other methodology with possibly less emphasis on recording the various degrees of group agreement should be considered.
Thank you.
Regards,
Philippe
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Justine, Thanks for the amendments and for your work with staff on including these in the GGP. Happy to call those 'motion changes' friendly (even though that's the attachment). The revised version is attached (both clean, and redline including the previous revisions for those who wouldn't have caught up already) Regards, Philippe From: Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 9:06 AM To: FOUQUART Philippe INNOV/NET <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Cc: council@gnso icann. org <council@gnso.icann.org>; gnso-secs@icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Motion for the initiation of the GNSO Guidance on Applicant Support Thank you, Philippe, for circulating the updated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support, and thank you also to those who worked on the same. With reference to the red-line copy, if I may suggest 4 minor amendments for consideration: 1. Pg 4, Task 4, 5th line, to delete the word "they". 2. Pg 5, the red text paragraph immediately after Task 6, to provide clarity and distinguish reference to the Working Group (from the SubPro Working Group) by adding "(constituted herein)" after the first instance of "the Working Group" in the sentence (or something to that effect). 3. Pg 7, to move the entire 3rd paragraph which reads, with red line amendments, "Members are expected to participate during the course of deliberations. Members are expected to represent the view of their appointing organization and may be called on to provide the official position of their appointing organization. Members will be responsible for participating in GGP consensus calls. Appointing organizations may replace their Member(s) at their discretion, but shall be responsible for ensuring that their Member(s) are appropriately prepared to contribute to the GGP without causing undue delays to the GGP's deliberations." up to top of pg 7, immediately after the sentence in the 1st paragraph, which reads, "Members shall be appointed by their organizations according to their own internal procedures." This is because, as I understand it, the intent behind the entire 3rd paragraph (as quoted) would apply to entire life of the Working Group in the event Council resolves to add more topics, and not just for Applicant Support. 4. Also on pg 7, assuming that the red line paragraph that reads, "Once the Working Group has been formed and before the first meeting is held, Council leadership will provide the Working Group with a draft set of "success criteria" for the Working Group, which the Working Group will refine." is intended to address an overarching "success criteria" which is in turn not intended to apply solely to the topic of Applicant Support, then I would suggest swapping the position of this paragraph with the one that precedes it immediately. Thank you in advance for considering the above. Kind regards, Justine On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 18:50, philippe.fouquart--- via council <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> wrote: Dear Councilors, Please find attached the revised motion and associated GGP initiation request on Applicant Support for our Council call on August 25th. The changes to the motion itself are marginal. The sources of those made to the GGP initiation request attached to the motion are twofold: * The discussion held at our last call, notably on the size, the flexibility and representative nature of the group * The proposal from Kurt, which we reviewed during and after the call (thanks Kurt) on the metrics, and skill set both within the group and for SMEs A final note to draw your attention on section 6. Decision-making methodology for GGP, which has not changed and as it stands is based on the Working Group Guidelines and GNSO consensus playbook. Views are welcome as to whether for this GGP, other methodology with possibly less emphasis on recording the various degrees of group agreement should be considered. Thank you. Regards, Philippe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ council mailing list council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. Orange Restricted _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
participants (3)
-
Justine Chew -
philippe.fouquart＠orange.com -
Terri Agnew