Letter re: Data Accuracy
Dear Councilors, This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...>) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow - 31 October. As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council's commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council's commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC. The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy. Thanks, Greg
Hi Greg, I'm a little confused about the timelines here. We recite in the letter to the GAC that Council previously agreed to defer action for a defined period or "for six months whichever is shorter." Did the Council take action to consider the Scoping Team recommendations within the six months previously communicated or are we saying the recent Council action to defer again was taken beyond that 6 month period previously communicated? Would it be important to communicate in this letter how long we think it will take to finalize and circulate the draft questions to the stakeholders, constituencies, and advisory committees regarding data accuracy? Thank you, Anne Thank you, Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council < council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> ) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by *end of day tomorrow – 31 October*.
As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC.
The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy.
Thanks,
Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thank you for the questions, Anne. We revised the draft to make it clearer. There are two timelines in play: First, the Council voted in September to defer consideration of the Accuracy Scoping Team's recommendations (1 and 2) for an additional six months while it finalized a proposal for how to make progress on accuracy (this extended the original deferral to March 2025). Second, Council agreed on a list of questions re: Accuracy in the October meeting, but did not include timelines in the letter to GAC because Council had not finalized them. ICANN org has requested until 29 November to respond to our initial questions about relevant regulation. Following receipt of the ICANN org's answers, which we believe will be helpful to inform the SG/C/AC responses, Leadership proposed giving ICANN groups (including GAC) until 31 January 2025 to respond to the other questions. We’ve edited the letter to let GAC know that we anticipate sending questions in the late November/early December timeframe with a proposed deadline of 31 January 2025. Does this answer your questions? Thanks, Greg From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 3:08 PM To: DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [council] Letter re: Data Accuracy CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Greg, I'm a little confused about the timelines here. We recite in the letter to the GAC that Council previously agreed to defer action for a defined period or "for six months whichever is shorter." Did the Council take action to consider the Scoping Team recommendations within the six months previously communicated or are we saying the recent Council action to defer again was taken beyond that 6 month period previously communicated? Would it be important to communicate in this letter how long we think it will take to finalize and circulate the draft questions to the stakeholders, constituencies, and advisory committees regarding data accuracy? Thank you, Anne Thank you, Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com<mailto:anneicanngnso@gmail.com> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org<mailto:council@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Councilors, This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...>) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow – 31 October. As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC. The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy. Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org<mailto:council@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org<mailto:council-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Many thanks. This is great. Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> wrote:
Thank you for the questions, Anne.
We revised the draft to make it clearer. There are two timelines in play:
First, the Council voted in September to defer consideration of the Accuracy Scoping Team's recommendations (1 and 2) for an additional six months while it finalized a proposal for how to make progress on accuracy (this extended the original deferral to March 2025).
Second, Council agreed on a list of questions re: Accuracy in the October meeting, but did not include timelines in the letter to GAC because Council had not finalized them. ICANN org has requested until 29 November to respond to our initial questions about relevant regulation. Following receipt of the ICANN org's answers, which we believe will be helpful to inform the SG/C/AC responses, Leadership proposed giving ICANN groups (including GAC) until 31 January 2025 to respond to the other questions.
We’ve edited the letter to let GAC know that we anticipate sending questions in the late November/early December timeframe with a proposed deadline of 31 January 2025.
Does this answer your questions?
Thanks, Greg
*From:* Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 30, 2024 3:08 PM *To:* DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> *Cc:* council@gnso.icann.org *Subject:* RE: [EXTERNAL] [council] Letter re: Data Accuracy
*CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Greg,
I'm a little confused about the timelines here. We recite in the letter to the GAC that Council previously agreed to defer action for a defined period or "for six months whichever is shorter."
Did the Council take action to consider the Scoping Team recommendations within the six months previously communicated or are we saying the recent Council action to defer again was taken beyond that 6 month period previously communicated?
Would it be important to communicate in this letter how long we think it will take to finalize and circulate the draft questions to the stakeholders, constituencies, and advisory committees regarding data accuracy?
Thank you,
Anne
Thank you,
Anne
Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council < council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> ) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by *end of day tomorrow – 31 October*.
As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC.
The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy.
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks Greg I understood that the absence of comments from other Councilors meant: no objections. I presume it will be sent out tomorrow? Desiree -- On Friday, 1 November 2024 at 23:19, Anne ICANN via council <council@icann.org> wrote:
Many thanks. This is great. Anne
Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> wrote:
Thank you for the questions, Anne.
We revised the draft to make it clearer. There are two timelines in play:
First, the Council voted in September to defer consideration of the Accuracy Scoping Team's recommendations (1 and 2) for an additional six months while it finalized a proposal for how to make progress on accuracy (this extended the original deferral to March 2025).
Second, Council agreed on a list of questions re: Accuracy in the October meeting, but did not include timelines in the letter to GAC because Council had not finalized them. ICANN org has requested until 29 November to respond to our initial questions about relevant regulation. Following receipt of the ICANN org's answers, which we believe will be helpful to inform the SG/C/AC responses, Leadership proposed giving ICANN groups (including GAC) until 31 January 2025 to respond to the other questions.
We’ve edited the letter to let GAC know that we anticipate sending questions in the late November/early December timeframe with a proposed deadline of 31 January 2025.
Does this answer your questions?
Thanks, Greg
From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 3:08 PM To: DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [council] Letter re: Data Accuracy
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Greg,
I'm a little confused about the timelines here. We recite in the letter to the GAC that Council previously agreed to defer action for a defined period or "for six months whichever is shorter."
Did the Council take action to consider the Scoping Team recommendations within the six months previously communicated or are we saying the recent Council action to defer again was taken beyond that 6 month period previously communicated?
Would it be important to communicate in this letter how long we think it will take to finalize and circulate the draft questions to the stakeholders, constituencies, and advisory committees regarding data accuracy?
Thank you,
Anne
Thank you,
Anne
Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026
anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:34 AM DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter ([letter[docs.google.com]](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...)) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow – 31 October.
As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the [draft letter [docs.google.com]](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...) notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC.
The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy.
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Letter looks good Greg, thanks. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy Com Laude T +44 (0) 20 7421 8250 Ext 255 [cid:image001.png@01DB2BC0.8B03F850] <https://comlaude.com/> Follow us on LinkedIn<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/pRkAAGVfAADw_RQA0> and YouTube<https://t-uk.xink.io/Tracking/Index/bhkAAGVfAADw_RQA0> From: DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> Sent: 30 October 2024 18:34 To: council@gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Letter re: Data Accuracy Dear Councilors, This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...>) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow - 31 October. As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council's commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council's commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC. The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy. Thanks, Greg ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that Com Laude Group Limited (the "Com Laude Group") does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group is a limited company registered in England and Wales with company number 10689074 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 6181291 and registered office at 28 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176 and registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, a corporation incorporated in the State of Washington and principal office address at Suite 332, Securities Building, 1904 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98101; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan with company number 0100-01-190853 and registered office at 1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan; Com Laude Domain ESP S.L.U., a company registered in Spain and registered office address at Calle Barcas 2, 2, Valencia, 46002, Spain. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com/>
Hello Greg, I am Ok with the letter as is. Thank you, Osvaldo
On 30 Oct 2024, at 3:34 PM, DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Councilors,
This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...>) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow – 31 October.
As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC.
The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy.
Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org <mailto:council@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org <mailto:council-leave@icann.org>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Same here. Thanks, Greg! Thomas Von: Osvaldo Novoa via council <council@icann.org> Datum: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2024 um 22:05 An: DiBiase, Gregory <dibiase@amazon.com> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org <council@gnso.icann.org> Betreff: [council] Re: Letter re: Data Accuracy Hello Greg, I am Ok with the letter as is. Thank you, Osvaldo On 30 Oct 2024, at 3:34 PM, DiBiase, Gregory via council <council@icann.org> wrote: Dear Councilors, This is a reminder to provide any feedback or comments on the draft GAC letter (letter[docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...>) circulated last week. To allow us sufficient time for review and final adjustments and to ensure the letter is send out before ICANN81, we would appreciate if all feedback could be submitted by end of day tomorrow – 31 October. As previously discussed, the Council agreed to send a letter to the GAC, acknowledging the importance of accuracy-related work and the Council’s commitment to making progress on this topic. Additionally, the draft letter [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1dk4wVouO7ch6U...> notes that the Council does not believe the DPA/DPS is a dependency for further work on accuracy. Instead, the letter acknowledges the Council’s commitment to make progress and plans to do this by soliciting input from interested groups, including the GAC. The letter has been updated to account for the discussed and agreed to next steps on Accuracy. Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ council mailing list -- council@icann.org<mailto:council@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to council-leave@icann.org<mailto:council-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (6)
-
Anne ICANN -
desiree-me -
DiBiase, Gregory -
Osvaldo Novoa -
Susan Payne -
Thomas Rickert | rickert.law