Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC
All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4th September 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan
The motion has been posted on the Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+04+September... Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/> From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] Sent: lundi 25 août 2014 22:12 To: council@gnso.icann.org Cc: David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Géry Subject: Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4th September 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan
Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014.
The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee
The motion will need to be seconded.
Thank-you,
Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
All, This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording. Therefore, I propose the following: 1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David's motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
This sounds very sensible to me. David On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording. Therefore, I propose the following: 1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David’s motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
Same here. Thanks Jonathan and David. Amr On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:
This sounds very sensible to me.
David
On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording.
Therefore, I propose the following:
1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David’s motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High
Hi,
It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :)
Thanks.
Amr
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote:
All,
Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014.
The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee
The motion will need to be seconded.
Thank-you,
Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
Thanks Both. Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 10:17 To: David Cake Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Same here. Thanks Jonathan and David. Amr On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote: This sounds very sensible to me. David On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording. Therefore, I propose the following: 1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David's motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson < <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
All, Noting that David's motion has now been amended here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+04+September +2014 I hereby withdraw my motion. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 10:17 To: David Cake Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info; council@gnso.icann.org; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Same here. Thanks Jonathan and David. Amr On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote: This sounds very sensible to me. David On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording. Therefore, I propose the following: 1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David's motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info Cc: council@gnso.icann.org; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson < <mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> jrobinson@afilias.info> wrote: All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
Sounds good to me. I had seconded David's original motion, and hereby second the amended version, if necessary. J. From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> Organization: Afilias Reply-To: "jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>" <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 at 5:20 To: 'Amr Elsadr' <aelsadr@egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org>>, 'David Cake' <dave@difference.com.au<mailto:dave@difference.com.au>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>>, 'Marika Konings' <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>>, 'Glen de Saint Gery' <Glen@icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>> Subject: RE: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC All, Noting that David's motion has now been amended here: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+04+September... I hereby withdraw my motion. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 03 September 2014 10:17 To: David Cake Cc: jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>; council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Same here. Thanks Jonathan and David. Amr On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:36 AM, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au<mailto:dave@difference.com.au>> wrote: This sounds very sensible to me. David On 2 Sep 2014, at 11:51 pm, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: All, This needs to be tidied up . The motions appear identical but mine actually has a couple of minor changes to the wording. Therefore, I propose the following: 1. That my wording is a friendly amendment to David's motion (hopefully acceptable to David & Amr) 2. I withdraw my motion and we remove the confusion of the two (near) identical motions. Thanks, Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 25 August 2014 23:43 To: jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> Cc: council@gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>; David Cake; Marika Konings; Glen de Saint Gery Subject: Re: [council] Motion - Appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC Importance: High Hi, It seems we have two identical motions regarding appointment of GNSO liaison to the GAC (one by David and one by Jonathan). I am happy to second either one or both, if a seconding is still necessary. :) Thanks. Amr On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:12 PM, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: All, Please see attached for a motion for consideration at the forthcoming Council meeting on 4thSeptember 2014. The motion relates to the Appointment of a GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee The motion will need to be seconded. Thank-you, Jonathan <Motion - Appointment of GNSO Liaison to the GAC (25 August 2014).docx>
participants (5)
-
Amr Elsadr
-
David Cake
-
Glen de Saint Géry
-
James M. Bladel
-
Jonathan Robinson