Michele: I am asking because to me is not clear. Can you explain why Typosquating was not included in the framework? Thanks. -ed On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:37 AM Michele Neylon - Blacknight < michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Why would it be?
The framework is pretty clear on what it is aimed at addressing.
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
*From: *GTLD-WG <gtld-wg-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> *Date: *Monday 21 October 2019 at 08:14 *To: *"cpwg@icann.org" <cpwg@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] DNS Abuse (Framework proposed by 11 Registries and Registrars)
I am wondering why *typosquatting* was not included in their DNS Abuse definitions list. Can anyone expand on this?
-ed
-- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.