My guess is that the best we'll get from a B Corp is an impact assessment. ________________________________ From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 7:32 PM To: Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [CPWG] PIR: Why an At-Large Board Member? First answer - Yes - (to your ‘no?’) there should be some mechanism to ensure that a ‘public interest’ perspective is part of their decision making process. Which is why I want something written into the documentation that requires consideration of the public interest - by whatever mechanism Holly On Jan 10, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org<mailto:JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>> wrote: Well, I MIGHT be asking that. I'm not sure what the At-Large has to do with managing ORG unless it's to bring an individual end user perspective or a kind of generic "public interest" perspective. It SEEMS that what should be asked is for participation by their nonprofit customers, no? Jonathan Zuck Executive Director Innovators Network Foundation www.Innovatorsnetwork.org<http://www.innovatorsnetwork.org/> ________________________________ From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 5:59:33 PM To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>>; Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org<mailto:JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>> Cc: CPWG <cpwg@icann.org<mailto:cpwg@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CPWG] PIR: Why an At-Large Board Member? I don't think that is the question Jonathan is asking. It is not why WE think we should be there or even why we think we would do a good job. It is why THEY should select us over other possible community representatives? Alan At 09/01/2020 05:36 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote: Hello Jonathan, all The "why At-Large" in this context can perhaps be likened to what eventually made At-Large to have a single Board member on ICANN Board. If At-Large believes that her voice is important on the "new" PIR decision table, and that it will be through Board representation, I don't see anything wrong with making that clear from the start. Contributing towards getting a generic block of slot with a "later" tag on its allocation won't be strategic IMO Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, 17:14 Jonathan Zuck, < JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org<mailto:JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org>> wrote: I recognize it feels natural in our comments/advice to suggest someone from At-Large be on the PIR board but again I feel it prudent to ask, why At-Large? Why wouldn’t we ask that 1/3 of the board members be representatives of 501c(3) non-profits or ASBLs from Brussels? Those same people might be in the At-Large but that wouldn’t be why they are on the board of PIR. Jonathan Zuck | Executive Director | Innovators Network jzuck@innovatorsnetwork.org<mailto:jzuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> | O 202.420.7497 | S jvzuck | [cid:image001.png@01D2AEED.C7EA7800] _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org<mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. Content-Type: image/png; name="image001.png" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image001.png" Content-ID: <16f8c6657384cff311> X-Attachment-Id: 16f8c6657384cff311 Content-Type: image/png; name="image001.png" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image001.png" Content-ID: <> X-Attachment-Id: _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org<mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org<mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.