On 22/10/2019 13:37, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Why would it be?
The framework is pretty clear on what it is aimed at addressing.
Typosquatting is not exactly a major problem compared to other forms of content targeted abuse. With typosquatting, there are some established legal approaches for dealing with the problem such as UDRP. A lot of the content targeted abuse depends on lifting content from other websites, search engine results and blogs and it is difficult to track. The aim is to create "evergreen" websites for PPC purposes with content that appears to be continually updated. The evergreen content is inteded to fool search engine algorithms. This is more webspam than e-mail spam and the framework seems to be focused on e-mail spam. Heavily discounted registrations tend to facilitate this form of webspam. Left unchecked, it can fill a TLD with templated content and drives out developed websites because the TLD gets a bad reputation. Regards...jmcc -- ********************************************************** John McCormac * e-mail: jmcc@hosterstats.com MC2 * web: http://www.hosterstats.com/ 22 Viewmount * Domain Registrations Statistics Waterford * And Historical DNS Database. Ireland * Over 516 Million Domains Tracked. IE * Skype: hosterstats.com ********************************************************** -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com