I really like their comment on rec 5,7 and 10,11 and believe it resonates with ours as well. I hope that the ePDP would reconsider her position, it's amazing that this isn't obvious to other ePDP stakeholders (especially the NCSG) Thanks for sharing. Cheers! Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, 07:45 Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca wrote:
Those following the EPDP will find this interesting.
Alan
From: "Heineman, Ashley" <AHeineman@ntia.doc.gov> To: GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:54:20 +0000 Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
Dear Kurt,
Please find attached a statement for including in the phase 1 final report from the GAC small group. FWIW - this does NOT represent an objection to the consensus calls or the report itself.
Thanks kindly,
Ashley Heineman
CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg