It's not wrong, but its context is disingenuous. At its superficial level it's fear-mongering (you can't automatically trust a domain just 'cause it's in dot-org, a characteristic common to almost all TLDs). At a deeper level it's an attempt to discredit (or at least dilute) the massive and nearly universal opposition to the PIR conversion by non-profit organizations. On the whole I consider it a FUD piece. ___________________ Evan Leibovitch, Toronto @evanleibovitch/@el56 On Fri., Dec. 6, 2019, 1:29 a.m. Jonathan Zuck, <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
Agreed! That said, it's not wrong.
Jonathan Zuck Executive Director Innovators Network Foundation www.Innovatorsnetwork.org
------------------------------ *From:* CPWG <cpwg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Evan Leibovitch < evanleibovitch@gmail.com> *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:05:52 PM *To:* Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> *Cc:* LAC-Discuss-en <lac-discuss-en@icann.org>; CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [CPWG] NYTimes: The .Org Mirage
Clearly the crisis-management PR firm hired by ISOC is busy earning its keep.
___________________ Evan Leibovitch, Toronto @evanleibovitch/@el56