Thanks for this Evan. Could we then please ask whomever is presenting on the IRTP to focus on the safeguards that will still be in place for authentication of the transfer if FOAs are not used Thanks Holly
On Jul 7, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Evin Erdogdu via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Hello CPWG members,
Ahead of the weekly meeting this Wednesday, 7 July at 13 UTC, the ALAC representatives to the Transfer Policy Review PDP plan to present a question to the CPWG: Can At-Large accept that the FOAs are not needed in the final new IRT Policy? ( i.e. that Transfer Authentication Code (TAC) is sufficient)? At the end of the discussion, there will be a poll to the CPWG with the question. Please refer to the CPWG agenda <https://community.icann.org/x/OYX8CQ> and the <https://community.icann.org/x/ZwXQCQ>At-Large Workspace: Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (PDP) <https://community.icann.org/x/ZwXQCQ> for relevant information. Thank you, Evin Ashley Erdoğdu Policy Analyst Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org <mailto:CPWG@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.