Dear Justine, A nameless ICANN Org has commented? Is this common? As for the Board comment, I note the issue of PIC enforcement is an issue since the Bylaws have tightened the Board's ability to do anything that could be deemed outside its Mission. I wonder how, with a tight interpretation of the Bylaws, the Public Interest can be upheld. Kindest regards, Olivier On 01/10/2020 06:16, Justine Chew wrote:
For those interested, here are _some_ of the submissions to the public comment process for the Subsequent Procedures Draft Final Report that closed on 30 Sep 2020:
* ALAC <https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/13799> /(publish pending)/ * ICANN Board <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/2020-09-30%20Maar...> * ICANN org <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/ICANN%20Org%20Fee...> * GAC <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/111390697/GAC%20Subpro%20Fi...>
_We may want to pay particular attention to the comments by the ICANN Board._
These are shared by way of links in case attachments are inadvertently filtered out during mail list distribution.
Kind regards,
Justine ---
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html