Hi Justine Thanks for the update on the Diacritics PDP Charter. As you've mentioned, I also support the three amendments to the draft charter, which I believe makes the PDP more practical and improves its optics. As discussed in the last ALAC meeting, even while GNSO has made the participation in the PDP open, it may still be useful for ALAC to designate its representatives to the PDP. This will ensure that there is a clear pathway for two-way communication between the PDP and CPWG, much like other membership-oriented PDPs such as the EPDP on IDNs. But this would be an internal arrangement within ALAC, and I'm not sure if we have to inform the PDP of this arrangement. With kind regards satish On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 7:05 PM Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear ALAC colleagues,
At yesterday's ALAC Monthly Meeting, I reported that the GNSO Council will be considering and voting on an amended Latin Script Diacritics PDP Charter at its 19 Dec meeting. Three amendments are proposed to the earlier draft charter; these are as follows:
1) limiting the scope of work; 2) adjusting the membership structure to make it an “Open Model”; and 3) including the Global Public Interest (GPI) Framework <https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit> and its checklist <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uVOXywoowxvM1Hn5GuCkkinuZiMc4smc/edi...> as a reference for analysis when conducting the PDP, per the ICANN Board’s recommendation.
I welcome all 3 amendments, in particular the Open Model PDP and inclusion of the GPI Framework checklist which are completely aligned with positions I have put forth before.
Having said that, Alan made an important point that even with an Open Model PDP, it would be necessary and useful for the ALAC to have designated participants who can bring PDP WG deliberations to the CPWG for discussion and to relay the ALAC/At-Large positions emanating from CPWG back to the PDP WG.
Please let me know *by 18 Dec* whether the ALAC would like to relay any sentiments to Council on this amended PDP charter (which is attached).
I intend to seek some clarify on next steps (eg when a call for a WG Chair, participants, etc will be made and when might the PDP WG be expected to commence its work).
Thank you,
Justine Chew ALAC Liaison to the GNSO GNSO Liaison Report Workspace <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/GNSO+Liaison+Report%2C+post-Oct+...> ------
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list -- cpwg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to cpwg-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.