HI Jahangir (and I believe Mouloud, Lavish and Jacob), One of the members of the GGP requested that we have an update from Staff regarding the previous round. I will share an update and the recording as soon as this meeting is organised. Thank you for raising this issue. Regards, Sarah On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 4:09 AM Jahangir Hossain <jrjahangir@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Evan and Sarah,
It would be helpful for us if we get the information on the *number of applications of earlier zero successful applicants under the original program*.
Regards / Md. Jahangir Hossain Member, Board of Trustees Internet Society Bangladesh Dhaka Chapter https://www.linkedin.com/in/jrjahangir/ https://internetsociety.org.bd/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:48 PM Carlton Samuels via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
+1.
I saw the announcement, responded and volunteered to assist. Not even an acknowledgement.
FWIW, both Evan and I served time on the original WG. For full disclosure, the NCSG membership served on the WG as well.
Carlton
============================== *Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 10:30, Evan Leibovitch via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:07 AM Sarah T. Kiden via CPWG <cpwg@icann.org> wrote:
I hope you are doing well. As you may be aware, the Applicant Support Program was developed to ensure worldwide accessibility and competition in the 2012 new generic top-level domain (gTLD) Program. It enabled new gTLD applicants meeting certain qualifying criteria to receive financial and non-financial support.
Actually, it didn't enable anyone, there were zero successful applicants under the original program. Much work was spent on the program with no effective benefit (except for painful lessons learned by the team).
The GNSO Council determined that the provision of guidance for the next
round is best accomplished via the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP).
How benevolent of them, considering that Applicant Support was started as an ALAC/GAC initiative, initially with explicit LACK of GNSO support and in some corners active hostility.
When did the GNSO acquire the ability to impose its "guidance" on the Advisory Committees? I must have missed that direction in the Bylaws.
- Evan
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ CPWG mailing list CPWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.